Abstract:Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition in older adults, being identified as a cause of disability in this population. Despite ir validity and reliability, the functional capacity tests are not often administered in patients with LBP but provide useful information related to mobility. A measurement property of the functional capacity tests that has not been investigated extensively in the LBP field is the resiveness, such as the capacity to detect changes during the intervention. Objectives To determine the responsiveness of three functional capacity tests, the Timed Up and Go test, the 4-meter Walk test, the 5 times Sit to Stand test, and to compare with the responsiveness of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in older adults with chronic LBP undergoing an 8-week intervention. Methods This is a responsiveness study with measurement before and after an 8-week intervention. It was prospectively registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (RBR-9prhzng). Patients with nonspecific LBP (age ≥60) were recruited. The functional capacity tests and the RMDQ were administered at baseline and after 8 weeks. The intervention followed the recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for the management of nonspecific LBP: The responsiveness was determined by calculating the effect size (ES), correlation analysis, and the analysis of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Results 118 older adults with chronic LBP were recruited. The RMDQ was the most responsiveness measure, followed by the Sit to Stand test. The ES for the RMDQ was large (ES= -0,74; 95%IC: -0,56; -0,92), whereas the 5 Times Sit to Stand test presented a small effect (EF= -0,45, 95%CI: - 0,26; -0,64). The Timed UP and Go test and the 4-meter Walk test small ESs (ES< 0,25). The 5 Times Sit to Stand test was the only one to show a fair correlation (0,25 < r <0,50) with RMDQ. The ROC analysis, only the RMDQ showed AUC values above the cut-off point of 0,70. Conclusion The RMDQ was responsive to an 8-week lumbar stabilization program in older adults with chronic LBP. The 5 Times Sit to Stand test was the most responsive but presented limitations with regard to the capacity to discriminate patients who recovered from those who did not recover. A possible explanation for the lack of responsiveness foto the tests may be due to the nature of the intervention, which was not focused on increasing ability and balance, components that are necessarily assessed by functional capacity tests. Implications Functional capacity tests are widely used to assess mobility and balance in older adults. Only the 5 Times Sit to Stand test was considered to able to detect changes in older adults who underwent an 8-week intervention program. The RMDQ was more responsive than any of the functional capacity tests.

Reliability of self-measured objective functional impairment using the timed up and go test in patients with diseases of the spine

The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review

Predictive and classification capabilities of the timed up and go as a physical performance measure in hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of 606 patients

The Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up & Go Test and the 30-S Sit-To-Stand Test Performed via Tele-Assessment in Ambulatory Patients with Stroke

Loaded and unloaded timed stair tests as tools for assessing advanced functional mobility in people with stroke

Developing a shortened spine functional index (SFI-10) for patients with sub-acute/chronic spinal disorders: a cross-sectional study

"TiC-TUG": technology in clinical practice using the instrumented timed up and go test—a scoping review

Towards Standardized Assessment of Outcomes in Back Pain—Validation of Linking Studies Between Disease-Specific and Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Identifying clusters of objective functional impairment in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease using unsupervised learning

Quantitative falls risk assessment in elderly people: results from a clinical study with distance based timed up-and-go test recordings

Multiple sclerosis functional tests and their comparability with self-administered values: A pilot study

Revisiting the “Timed Up and Go” test: a 12-s cut-off can predict Hospitalization Associated Functional Decline in older adults

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Fatigability Index for Full-Time Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury

DETERMINING MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF TIMED UP AND GO TEST, 5 TIMES SIT TO STAND TEST, 10 METERS WALK TEST, AND MAXIMAL VOLUNTARY ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION OF KNEE EXTENSORS AND FLEXORS IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

Evaluating the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the performance-oriented mobility assessment among patients with chronic stroke

Intra and Inter-Device Reliabilities of the Instrumented Timed-Up and Go Test Using Smartphones in Young Adult Population

30-Second Chair Stand and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand Tests Are Interesting Tools for Assessing Disability and Ability to Ambulate among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY AND DISABILITY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A STUDY OF RESPONSIVENESS

Physical function measurements predict mortality in ambulatory older men

Reliability and validity of Oswestry Disability Index among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery

Toward a specific outcome instrument for spinal trauma: how to measure function and health