Abstract:Objectives To estimate the safety and efficiency of transvesical Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (T-RARP) compared with standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (S-RARP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods 174 patients bearing localized PCa and undergoing T-RARP or S-RARP between October 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively enrolled in our analysis. All potential baseline confounders were strictly restrained with propensity-score matching (PM) method (1: 1). Within the matched setting, the perioperative and functional outcomes were compared between the T-RARP and S-RARP groups, while the oncological results and functional recovery of the two arms were presented with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results Finally, 114 and 60 eligible patients harbouring localized PCa were identified in the S-RARP and T-RARP group, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups were found in all baseline characteristics after PM. Within the matched cohort, no case was converted to open surgery in either group. The T-RARP group was significantly related to a higher mean operative time ( p = 0.001) and shorter median hospital stay length ( p < 0.001). There were not significant differences in the median estimated blood loss and specimen Gleason score between the two arms. The proportions of transfusion, pT3a disease, postoperative complication, and positive surgical margin in the T-RARP group were also comparable to that in the S-RARP group. The mean prostate-specific antigen and median erectile functional scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at postoperative 3 months and last follow-up. T-RARP vs. S-RARP had significantly improved urinary continence (UC) rates at the removal of catheter ( p < 0.001) and postoperative 3 months ( p < 0.001), but the significant difference between the two groups in UC recovery disappeared at last follow-up ( p = 0.119). No significant difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival was observed following the two surgeries ( p = 0.727). Conclusions T-RARP by experienced hands was feasible for selected patients with clinically localized PCa, yielding significantly improved early return to UC and similar erectile functional preservation without compromising oncological control when compared with the standard approach.

Comparison of sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and carbon-ion radiotherapy for Japanese prostate cancer patients using propensity score matching

Six-year outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

Quality of life after brachytherapy or bilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort

Robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis based on 15 years and 18,805 patients

Modified Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for cases with anterior tumor: a propensity score-matched analysis

Comparison of Robot‐Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Using the Made‐in‐Japan Robotic System Hinotori Versus Da Vinci: A Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis

The Impact of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy on Cancer-Specific Mortality for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of an Other-Cause Mortality Matched Cohort

Intermediate-Term Oncological Outcome Assessment for Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Comparing Retzius Sparing to Standard Approach in a Randomized Control Cohort

Evaluation of sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A farewell to IIEF questionnaire

Win ratio analysis of short-term clinical outcomes of focal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for the patients with localized prostate cancer

Effect of robotic surgery on urinary function following radical resection for middle and low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Transvesical Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Efficacy of brachytherapy versus radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer-propensity score-matched comparison

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a study comparing 3-year genitourinary toxicity between CyberKnife and volumetric-modulated arc therapy by propensity score analysis

Single-docking Robotic Assisted Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer below Peritoneal Reflection: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Survival Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy and External Beam Radiotherapy in Clinically Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based, Propensity Score Matched Study

Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based comparison

Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and image-guided percutaneous cryoablation for cT1 renal cell carcinoma

Comparative study of HIFU partial gland ablation and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: an evidence-based approach

Biochemical recurrence after chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in very-high-risk prostate cancer patients

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Combination With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Propensity Score Matched Analysis