Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and image-guided percutaneous cryoablation for cT1 renal cell carcinoma

Tomoaki Yamanoi,Kensuke Bekku,Kasumi Yoshinaga,Yuki Maruyama,Kentaro Nagao,Tatsushi Kawada,Yusuke Tominaga,Noriyuki Umakoshi,Takuya Sadahira,Satoshi Katayama,Takehiro Iwata,Mayu Uka,Shingo Nishimura,Kohei Edamura,Tomoko Kobayashi,Yasuyuki Kobayashi,Takao Hiraki,Motoo Araki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.012
Abstract:Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and image-guided percutaneous cryoablation (IG-PCA) for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 679 patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma treated with RAPN or IG-PCA between 2012 and 2021. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic analysis to adjust for imbalances in baseline characteristics. We compared oncological and functional outcomes between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Following the matching process, 108 patients were included in each group. No patient in the RAPN group developed local recurrence. In the IG-PCA group, three patients experienced local tumor progression. The patients underwent salvage thermal ablations by the secondary technique; 2 underwent IG-PCA and 1 underwent microwave ablation, resulting in a local control rate of 100%. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of 5-year recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (log-rank test; P = 0.11, P = 0.64, and P = 0.17, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the 2 treatments in major and overall complication rates (P = 0.75 and P = 0.82, respectively). Both groups showed similar rates of less than 10% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline at 12 months post-treatment and 5-year renal function preservation rates (P = 0.88 and P = 0.38, respectively). Conclusions: IG-PCA demonstrated oncological outcomes comparable to those of RAPN. RAPN addressed the disadvantages of conventional procedures and allowed for safety outcomes comparable to IG-PCA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?