Abstract:Background Cluster randomization trials are widely used to test the effect of an intervention when individuals are naturally found in groups such as communities. For several separate studies of a similar intervention, it may be of interest to combine their results using meta-analysis procedures. However, this task requires consideration of both the likely dependencies among cluster members (intracluster correlation) and stratification based on the studies considered. Purpose In this article, several possible approaches for meta-analysis are considered for cluster randomization trials having a binary outcome. Methods It is first noted that the standard Mantel—Haenszel test is invalid in this context since it ignores dependencies among cluster members. Two modifications are therefore considered as well as a general inverse variance approach and a procedure based on the Woolf statistic which does not require the availability of trial-specific design effects. Empirical Type I errors and powers for the different procedures considered are evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. To illustrate the techniques, data are used from trials performed in four countries to compare two antenatal care programs with respect to their effects on the risk of hypertension during pregnancy. Results For the simulation scenarios considered, an adjusted Mantel—Haenszel procedure provides a valid test with the greatest power slightly outperforming the general inverse variance approach. Limitations The potential need to adjust for possible confounding was not considered. However, more detailed information on confounders would not likely be available for most meta-analyses. Conclusion Two procedures performed well. However, the choice of analysis approach also inevitably depends on the nature and extent of the available data. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 491—498. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Methods for meta-analysis and meta-regression of binomial data: concepts and tutorial with Stata command metapreg

MetaStan: An R package for Bayesian (model-based) meta-analysis using Stan

A Suite of network Commands in Stata for Network Meta-analysis

How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial

Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes

A comparison of methods for the analysis of binomial proportion data in behavioral research

Meta‐epidemiological Study: a Step‐by‐step Approach by Using R

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

Application of Stata in Exploring Sources of Heterogeneity: Meta-Regression Analysis

A re-analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta-analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters

Meta-analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests without a gold standard

Robust Point and Variance Estimation for Meta‐analyses with Selective Reporting and Dependent Effect Sizes

Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package

A Hands-On Tutorial for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Example Data Set and Codes

A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes

Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes

Intervention meta-analysis: application and practice using R software

Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods

P‐hacking in meta‐analyses: A formalization and new meta‐analytic methods

Use of copula to model within-study association in bivariate meta-analysis of binomial data at the aggregate level a Bayesian approach and application to surrogate endpoint evaluation

Mastering meta‐analysis in Microsoft Excel with MetaXL add‐in: A comprehensive tutorial and guide to meta‐analysis