Life cycle carbon footprints of alternative sludge pretreatment technologies to recover carbon sources for denitrification

Silan Zhao,Yingjie Xu,Jiayi Yuan,Huimin Chang,Shengwei Wang,Yan Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143488
IF: 11.1
2024-09-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:Excess sludge from wastewater treatment holds promise as a carbon source for denitrification. While there have been attempts at technological breakthroughs for carbon recovery from sludge through pretreatment and hydrolysis, a low-carbon footprint solution remains elusive. In this study, we evaluated seven pretreatment technologies for carbon recovery from sludge using life cycle assessment (LCA) modeling. The carbon footprints of technological configurations involving alkaline, ultrasound, thermal, oxidation, mechanical, microwave, and alkali/thermal treatments were quantified based on 123 consistent datasets, and compared by incorporating probability and uncertainty analyses with Monte Carlo and global sensitivity methods. Alkaline treatment achieved carbon footprint savings with a median of −128.71 kg CO 2 -eq/t TS, and the other technological configurations all show loads in median values. Significant variations in carbon footprints were observed both within and across different technological configurations. Probability distributions reveal overlaps among these configurations. Alkaline treatment has a high probability of obtaining carbon footprints ranging from −300 to 300 kg CO 2 -eq/t TS, while those for the other configurations showed various distribution with modes ranging from 0 to 3000 kg CO 2 -eq/t TS. Energy and chemical consumptions during pretreatment emerging were identified as key factors influencing the carbon footprint, with contributing 95–99% of the result uncertainty. Recommendations based on the top 15% probability indicate that technological configurations involving alkali/thermal and alkaline treatments offer a good balance of carbon source quality (180.12 kg/t TS and 142.39 kg/t TS, respectively) and relatively low carbon footprints (517.29 ± 80.06 kg CO 2 -eq/t TS and 136.99 ± 648.64 kg CO 2 -eq/t TS, respectively). These findings help identify the most sustainable technologies for carbon recovery from sludge and their potential improvements from a carbon footprint perspective. This study thus underscores the need for further research and technological advancements in sludge treatment to facilitate carbon recovery through denitrification.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?