BH14 Bald-faced lies: a qualitative review of misinformation on alopecia

Paula Finnegan,Cathal O’Connor,Michelle Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.161
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Hair loss, or alopecia, is a major issue worldwide, and can be associated with negative psychological effects. Patients often use the internet and social media to research health-related issues. Health misinformation can confuse patients and have a negative impact on decision making, leading patients to search for illogical ‘causes’ and seek groundless ‘cures’. A PubMed literature search was performed, using the terms ‘alopecia’ AND ‘misinformation’ OR ‘disinformation’ OR ‘conspiracy theory’, alongside a Google search using combinations of these terms. Further searches were also performed on social media platforms including Instagram, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Four papers were deemed to be appropriate for inclusion. Common myths highlighted on social media included false causes of hair loss, criticism of conventional hair loss treatments, recommendation of alternative hair loss treatments (including for chemotherapy-induced hair loss) and unhelpful haircare practices. False causes of hair loss included hat wearing, sun exposure, excess washing or brushing, use of gelatin-containing hair products, excess testosterone, and sexual intercourse. Many posts criticized conventional alopecia treatments, including minoxidil, topical steroids, finasteride and Janus kinase inhibitors. Several alternative treatments were promoted online, often as ‘natural’ supplements, such as zinc, iron, biotin, and various oils and extracts. Certain common haircare practices were discouraged or recommended online, such as hair brushing and hair straightening. All healthcare professionals, including dermatologists, are responsible for actively combatting health misinformation.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?