Abstract:In this study, the effect of the clavicular tunnel distance/clavicular length ratio on the reduction loss in AC joint dislocation operated with single bundle SLD was evaluated. Based on our results and previous anatomical studies, we think that position of the clavicular tunnel with a ratio between 0.17 and 0.24 will maintance the reduction. Objective The treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations offers numerous options, and ongoing debates persist regarding their comparative effectiveness. Among these options, the suspensory loop device (SLD) is one of the most favored treatment modalities. Despite the observed high reduction loss rate associated with SLD, the treatment yields favorable clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with acute type 3 and 5 ACJ dislocations who underwent open and arthroscopic procedures using a single‐bundle SLD, and to evaluate the effect of clavicular tunnel position on reduction loss. Methods Thirty‐seven eligible patients diagnosed with acute type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocation who underwent open and arthroscopic surgery with a single‐bundle SLD between January 2015 and March 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data and radiological measurements including coracoclavicular (CC) interval, clavicle length (CL), and implant distance (ID) were recorded. The ID/CL ratio was calculated and a value between 0.17 and 0.24 was considered as "acceptable implant position". Reduction loss and other complications were noted. Patients were divided into two groups: open (Group 1) and arthroscopic (Group 2). Constant Murray Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used for clinical and functional outcomes. Non‐parametric tests were used for statistical analysis of variables. Results The study included six females (16.2%) and 31 males (83.8%) with a mean age of 40.2 ± 14.7 years (range: 20–75). The mean follow‐up period was 22.3 ± 16.7 months (range: 6–72). The average time from trauma to surgery was 6.3 ± 5.3 days (range: 1–18). At the last follow‐up, the CMS was 89.3 ± 8.8 and the VAS score was 2.1 ± 0.9. The mean ID/CL ratio was 0.19 ± 0.1 and 19 patients (51.4%) were between 0.17 and 0.24. Reduction loss was observed in nine patients (24.3%). There were no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding operation time (p = 0.998), ID/CL ratio (p = 0.442), reduction loss (p = 0.458), CMS (p = 0.325), and VAS score (p = 0.699). Of the 28 patients without reduction loss, 16 had an ID/CL ratio between 0.17 and 0.24 (p = 0.43). Furthermore, within the 0.17–0.24 interval, CMS was higher with an average of 91.8 ± 5.1 compared to the other intervals (p = 0.559). Conclusion The clinical and functional outcomes of acute type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocation operated open and arthroscopically with single‐bundle SLD are similar and satisfactory. A clavicular tunnel position in the range of 0.17–0.24 (ID/CL ratio) is recommended to maintain postoperative reduction.

Factors influencing clavicular tunnel widening after single bundle coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

Clavicular Tunnel Complications after Coracoclavicular Reconstruction in Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Coracoid Loop versus Coracoid Tunnel Fixation

Radiographic alterations in clavicular bone tunnel width following anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries

Digital anatomical analysis of drilling position of the clavicle in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

Bone tunnel placement influences shear stresses at the coracoid process after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a finite element study and radiological analysis

Reconstruction of Coracoclavicular Ligament Combined with Hook Plate Technique for Treatment of Distal Clavicle Fractures Involving Avulsion of Coracoclavicular Ligament

Clavicle and coracoid process drilling technique for truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Concomitant Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with a Duo-Figure-8 Autogenic Graft Wrapping Technique for Treating Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation

Addition of Allograft and Acromioclavicular Cerclage Improves Outcomes of Arthroscopic-Assisted Reconstruction of Acromioclavicular Separation With a Single Coracoclavicular Tunnel

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Combined with Open Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using Knot Hiding Clavicular Implants Is a Stable Solution

Single tunnel technique versus coracoid sling technique for arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

A Prospective Study of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with Autogenous Peroneus Longus Tendon for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic and navigation-assisted two tunnel technique for coracoclavicular ligament augmentation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations

Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction A Systematic Review And A Biomechanical Study Of A Triple Endobutton Technique

The Effect of Clavicular Tunnel Position on Reduction Loss in Patients with Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations Operated with a Single‐Bundle Suspensory Loop Device

Safety Location of Bony Tunnel in Coraco-Clavicular Ligament Reconstruction: a Digital Anatomical Study

Biomechanical testing of three coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques with a 3D printing navigation template for clavicle-coracoid drilling

Anatomic study of coracoclavicular ligaments for reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Gradual stabilization and narrowing of bone tunnels following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Editorial Commentary: Tunnel Widening and Loss of Reduction May Be Inevitable After Acromioclavicular Stabilization With Cortical Suspensory Devices Whether Inset (Top Hats) or Onlay (Buttons)

Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.