An Intensified Energy-Saving Architecture for Side-Stream Extractive Distillation of Four-Azeotrope Mixtures Considering Economic, Environmental and Safety Criteria Simultaneously
Shirui Sun,Liang Fu,Ao Yang,Weifeng Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123132
IF: 8.6
2023-01-01
Separation and Purification Technology
Abstract:Side-stream extractive distillation is used in separating azeotropic mixtures due to its advantages in energysaving. However, environmental and safety aspects should also be considered in most chemical industries. Thus, this work focuses on thermodynamic analysis, multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making. The main contributions of this work are developing the intensified side-stream extractive distillation for complex ternary azeotropic mixture, obtaining the trade-offs between the economic, environmental and safety impacts of SSED processes and determining the best sustainable SSED process according to objective mathematical analysis. A systematic intensified architecture including conceptual design, multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making is proposed. Firstly, three strategies of side-stream extractive distillation (i.e., SSED-1, SSED-2, and SSED-3) are proposed via the thermodynamic analysis including quaternary phase diagram. Subsequently, the three strategies are optimized via the multi-objective particle swarm algorithm simultaneously using total annual costs (TAC), CO2 emission and process route index (PRI) as objective functions. Finally, the optimal economic, environmental and safety performance of such a complex system is determined by the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution method with entropy weighting information. The results indicate that the introduction of the side-stream for extractive distillation could decrease the exergy loss and increase the thermodynamic efficiency. The SSED-1 process shows that the best performance in economic, safety and environmental aspects, which reduce 19.21% of TAC, 5.24% of PRI and 16.80% of CO2 emission, respectively.