Abstract:Background: Existing literature overlooks the role of gender and race on research productivity, particularly in the context of primary care research. This study examines how gender and race influence the research productivity of primary care researchers in Canada, addressing a gap in existing literature. Methods: Qualitative, descriptive methods were used, involving 60-min interviews with 23 Canadian primary care researchers. 13 participants were female (57%) and 10 participants (43%) were male. Fourteen participants were White (non-racialized; 61%), 8 were racialized (35%) and 1 did not comment on race (4%). Reflexive thematic analysis captured participant perceptions of factors influencing research productivity, including individual, professional, institutional, and systemic aspects. Findings: Systemic bias and institutional culture, including racism, sexism, and unconscious biases against racialized women, emerge as key barriers to research productivity. The parenting life stage further compounds these biases. Barriers include lack of representation in faculty roles, toxic work environments, research productivity metrics, and exclusion by colleagues. Participants indicated that institutional reforms and systemic interventions are needed to foster a diverse, equitable, and inclusive environment. Strategies include recruiting equity-focused leaders, increasing representation of racialized female faculty, diversity training, mentorship programs, providing meaningful support, flexible work arrangements, and protected research time. Sponsors can offer more targeted grants for female and racialized researchers. Adjusting metrics for gender, race, parenthood, and collaborative metrics is proposed to enhance diversity and inclusion among researchers. Interpretation: This study underscores the importance of addressing systemic bias at institutional and systemic levels to create a fair and supportive environment for primary care researchers. A multitude of strategies are needed including increasing representation of racialized female faculty, creating supportive and psychologically safe work environments, and public reporting of data on faculty composition for accreditation and funding decisions. Together, these strategies can alleviate the triple whammy and free these researchers from the Sisyphus Punishment - the absurdity of being asked to climb a hill while pushing a boulder with no hope of reaching the top. Funding: College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Academia needs radical change — mothers are ready to pave the way

Impact of COVID-19 on academic mothers

Redefining academic trajectories: A comprehensive analysis of the factors and impacts of the gender gap in STEM higher education

The ethics of care and academic motherhood amid COVID‐19

How to plug the female mentoring gap in Latin American science

Researcher parents are paying a high price for conference travel — here's how to fix it

Feeling devalued : the creative industries, motherhood, gender and class inequality

Insights from four female scientists caught at the early-career crossroads

The Specter of Motherhood: Culture and the Production of Gendered Career Aspirations in Science and Engineering

The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Gender, Culture, and College Students' Views about Work and Family

Closing the scissor-shaped curve: Strategies to promote gender equality in academia

Exposing the Mythology of Balance and the Ecology of Graduate Student Mother Resilience in COVID-19

The Impact of Motherhood on Women’s Career Progression: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Interventions

The red lipstick mentor

Could roving researchers help address the challenge of taking parental leave?

Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions

Care in academia: an exploration of student parents’ experiences

'Maybe I was never meant to be in science': how imposter syndrome seizes scientist mothers

Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Mentoring as Support for African Women’s Academic Career Trajectories

“Navigating” through a scientific career: A question of private and professional configurational supports

Will they always be living the Sisyphus punishment? The triple whammy for racialized women: a qualitative investigation of primary care researchers in Canada