Abstract:We synthesized the vast, contradictory scholarly literature on gender bias in academic science from 2000 to 2020. In the most prestigious journals and media outlets, which influence many people’s opinions about sexism, bias is frequently portrayed as an omnipresent factor limiting women’s progress in the tenure-track academy. Claims and counterclaims regarding the presence or absence of sexism span a range of evaluation contexts. Our approach relied on a combination of meta-analysis and analytic dissection. We evaluated the empirical evidence for gender bias in six key contexts in the tenure-track academy: (a) tenure-track hiring, (b) grant funding, (c) teaching ratings, (d) journal acceptances, (e) salaries, and (f) recommendation letters. We also explored the gender gap in a seventh area, journal productivity, because it can moderate bias in other contexts. We focused on these specific domains, in which sexism has most often been alleged to be pervasive, because they represent important types of evaluation, and the extensive research corpus within these domains provides sufficient quantitative data for comprehensive analysis. Contrary to the omnipresent claims of sexism in these domains appearing in top journals and the media, our findings show that tenure-track women are at parity with tenure-track men in three domains (grant funding, journal acceptances, and recommendation letters) and are advantaged over men in a fourth domain (hiring). For teaching ratings and salaries, we found evidence of bias against women; although gender gaps in salary were much smaller than often claimed, they were nevertheless concerning. Even in the four domains in which we failed to find evidence of sexism disadvantaging women, we nevertheless acknowledge that broad societal structural factors may still impede women’s advancement in academic science. Given the substantial resources directed toward reducing gender bias in academic science, it is imperative to develop a clear understanding of when and where such efforts are justified and of how resources can best be directed to mitigate sexism when and where it exists.

Closing the scissor-shaped curve: Strategies to promote gender equality in academia

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM

Gender Issues in Computer Science: Lessons Learnt and Reflections for the Future

Fixing the leaky pipeline: Tips to promote gender equity in Academic Medicine

Uncovering gender gap in academia: A comprehensive analysis within the software engineering community

Redefining academic trajectories: A comprehensive analysis of the factors and impacts of the gender gap in STEM higher education

Gender Disparities in Nobel Prize Winning Labs. A Look into Glass Ceilings, Maternal Walls and Bottlenecks

Empowering educators: the key to achieving gender parity in STEM fields

Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines

STEM EDUCATION AND THE GENDER GAP: STRATEGIES FOR ENCOURAGING GIRLS TO PURSUE STEM CAREERS

Gender Equality in STEM: Exploring Self-Efficacy Through Gender Awareness

The Myth of Meritocracy and the Matilda Effect in STEM: Paper Acceptance and Paper Citation

Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions

Individual and gender inequality in computer science: A career study of cohorts from 1970 to 2000

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

Women in Science: Surpassing Subtle and Overt Biases through Intervention Programs

Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration

Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions

Eliminating Gender Bias in Computer Science Education Materials

Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists