Abstract:The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications of Big Data lags behind. In order to bridge such a gap, this article systematically and comprehensively analyses academic literature concerning the ethical implications of Big Data, providing a watershed for future ethical investigations and regulations. Particular attention is paid to biomedical Big Data due to the inherent sensitivity of medical information. By means of a meta-analysis of the literature, a thematic narrative is provided to guide ethicists, data scientists, regulators and other stakeholders through what is already known or hypothesised about the ethical risks of this emerging and innovative phenomenon. Five key areas of concern are identified: (1) informed consent, (2) privacy (including anonymisation and data protection), (3) ownership, (4) epistemology and objectivity, and (5) ‘Big Data Divides’ created between those who have or lack the necessary resources to analyse increasingly large datasets. Critical gaps in the treatment of these themes are identified with suggestions for future research. Six additional areas of concern are then suggested which, although related have not yet attracted extensive debate in the existing literature. It is argued that they will require much closer scrutiny in the immediate future: (6) the dangers of ignoring group-level ethical harms; (7) the importance of epistemology in assessing the ethics of Big Data; (8) the changing nature of fiduciary relationships that become increasingly data saturated; (9) the need to distinguish between ‘academic’ and ‘commercial’ Big Data practices in terms of potential harm to data subjects; (10) future problems with ownership of intellectual property generated from analysis of aggregated datasets; and (11) the difficulty of providing meaningful access rights to individual data subjects that lack necessary resources. Considered together, these eleven themes provide a thorough critical framework to guide ethical assessment and governance of emerging Big Data practices.

Responsible use of population neuroscience data: Towards standards of accountability and integrity

Responsible Use of Population Neuroscience Data: Toward Standards of Accountability and Integrity

Transparency and reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study

Population Neuroscience: Strategies to Promote Data Sharing While Protecting Privacy

Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition

Enabling responsible public genomics

Parent attitudes towards data sharing in developmental science

An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers

Building Towards an Adolescent Neural Urbanome: Expanding Environmental Measures using Linked External Data (LED) in the ABCD Study

Assessment of the impact of shared data on the scientific literature

Responsible data management

Sharing privacy-sensitive access to neuroimaging and genetics data: a review and preliminary validation

Transforming Scientific Inquiry: Tapping Into Digital Data by Building a Culture of Transparency and Consent

Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions

Who Owns the Data? Open Data for Healthcare

The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts

Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance

The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes

A Case for the Use of Open Data as a Tool to Incorporate Socioscientific Topics into Neuroscience Education

How to address data privacy concerns when using social media data in conservation science