Abstract:Background: Patients and publics are generally positive about data-intensive health research. However, conditions need to be fulfilled for their support. Ensuring confidentiality, security, and privacy of patients' health data is pivotal. Patients and publics have concerns about secondary use of data by commercial parties and the risk of data misuse, reasons for which they favor personal control of their data. Yet, the potential of public benefit highlights the potential of building trust to attenuate these perceptions of harm and risk. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on how conditions for support of data-intensive health research can be operationalized to that end remains scant. Objective: This study aims to inform efforts to design governance frameworks for data-intensive health research, by gaining insight into the preferences of patients and publics for governance policies and measures. Methods: We distributed a digital questionnaire among a purposive sample of patients and publics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric inferential statistics to compare group differences and explore associations between policy preferences. Results: Study participants (N=987) strongly favored sharing their health data for scientific health research. Personal decision-making about which research projects health data are shared with (346/980, 35.3%), which researchers/organizations can have access (380/978, 38.9%), and the provision of information (458/981, 46.7%) were found highly important. Health data-sharing policies strengthening direct personal control, like being able to decide under which conditions health data are shared (538/969, 55.5%), were found highly important. Policies strengthening collective governance, like reliability checks (805/967, 83.2%) and security safeguards (787/976, 80.6%), were also found highly important. Further analysis revealed that participants willing to share health data, to a lesser extent, demanded policies strengthening direct personal control than participants who were reluctant to share health data. This was the case for the option to have health data deleted at any time (P<.001) and the ability to decide the conditions under which health data can be shared (P<.001). Overall, policies and measures enforcing conditions for support at the collective level of governance, like having an independent committee to evaluate requests for access to health data (P=.02), were most strongly favored. This also applied to participants who explicitly stressed that it was important to be able to decide the conditions under which health data can be shared, for instance, whether sanctions on data misuse are in place (P=.03). Conclusions: This study revealed that both a positive attitude toward health data sharing and demand for personal decision-making abilities were associated with policies and measures strengthening control at the collective level of governance. We recommend pursuing the development of this type of governance policy. More importantly, further study is required to understand how governance policies and measures can contribute to the trustworthiness of data-intensive health research.

Responsible Use of Population Neuroscience Data: Toward Standards of Accountability and Integrity

Population Neuroscience: Strategies to Promote Data Sharing While Protecting Privacy

Sharing privacy-sensitive access to neuroimaging and genetics data: a review and preliminary validation

Enabling responsible public genomics

The spectrum of data sharing policies in neuroimaging data repositories

Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms

Research Data Management and Data Sharing for Reproducible Research-Results of a Community Survey of the German National Research Data Infrastructure Initiative Neuroscience

Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition

Sharing Neuron Data: Carrots, Sticks, and Digital Records

Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy

Comparing Attitudes About Genomic Privacy and Data Sharing in Adolescents and Parents of Children Enrolled in a Genomic Research Repository

Sharing Neurophysiology Data from the Allen Brain Observatory: Lessons Learned

Parent attitudes towards data sharing in developmental science

Transparency and Reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study

Reflection over compliance: Critiquing mandatory data sharing policies for qualitative research

Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions

Commitments for Ethically Responsible Sourcing, Use, and Reuse of Patient Data in the Digital Age: Cocreation Process

The end game: respecting major sources of population diversity

The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust

Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study