Abstract:For children who show strongly deviant behaviour in the Netherlands, a distinction is made between behavioural problems and psychiatric problems. As a result, two different domains have emerged over time, each with its own legal frameworks and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consequently, there is no well-organized, coherent system for youth mental health care in the Netherlands. This strong dichotomy raises the question whether patients are being admitted to facilities where they are receiving appropriate care. In addition, referral bias can arise, because the type of complaint with which a young person presents is often dependent on the type of coping of the individual and thus, in turn, the gender of the patient. In this Position Paper, we examined the gender distribution at a youth psychiatric high and intensive care (HIC-Y) and other streams of youth care in the Netherlands to explore possible inequities in access to psychiatric care among children and adolescents. Results show that girls are significantly more likely than boys to be admitted to the HIC-Y for suicidal thoughts, self-harm and emotional dysregulation. In fact, girls account for 80% of all admissions, while boys account for only 20%. In contrast, regional and national reports from youth services and probation show a majority of boys being admitted (56–89%). The way care is organized (lack of cross-domain collaboration and the interplay between gender-dependent coping and exclusion criteria) seems to play a role in the underrepresentation of boys in acute psychiatry and their overrepresentation in secure youth care. Based on our research results, the concern is raised whether boys have a greater chance of undertreatment for psychiatric problems. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying factors that contribute to gender bias in psychiatric admissions, and to develop interventions that promote gender equality in healthcare.

[Care and law for young people are constantly developing]

Position Paper: fragmented youth healthcare services in the Netherlands endanger treatment of teenage boys with psychiatric disorders

[Admission with freedom restriction of minors to child and adolescent psychiatrics clinics--medical decisions without regard for psychodynamic sequelae?]

Organization and content of primary care for adolescents – comparison of actual and desired situation

Mental health and capacity laws in Northern Ireland: examining the position of children and young people

[Reform of the law on compulsory admission in Belgium: more tailored healthcare?]

An agenda for future research regarding the mental health of young people with care experience

Easy access to youth mental health services in the Netherlands

Cross-national Analysis of Legislation, Policy and Service Frameworks for Adolescent Young Carers in Europe

Child-Friendly Justice: turning law into reality

Criminal Liability of Minors in Comparative Law: Special References to Japan and China. Implications

Knowledge Gaps and Bridges: The Relationship between the Awareness of General Patient Rights and the Awareness of Minors’ Patient Rights in the Netherlands

Physical child abuse and social change. Judicial intervention in families in The Netherlands, 1960-1995

Examining Youth Flexible ACT Model Implementation in the Netherlands

[Collaboration with patients' family members and representatives: legal perspective and barriers in clinical practice]

[Trends in compulsory admissions and care in the period 2003-2023 in the Netherlands]

[The reform of guardianship law]

Young, Accused and Detained; Awful, But Lawful? Pre-Trial Detention and Children’s Rights Protection in Contemporary Western Societies

The 2021 cross-national and comparative classification of in-country awareness and policy responses to ‘young carers’

Ethical aspects of clinical research with minors

A survey of the psychiatric care provided for children and young people in general hospital settings in New Zealand