Comparing neoantigen cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint therapy unveils an effective vaccine and anti-TREM2 macrophage-targeting dual therapy

Sunita Keshari,Alexander S Shavkunov,Qi Miao,Akata Saha,Tomoyuki Minowa,Martina Molgora,Charmelle D Williams,Mehdi Chaib,Anna M Highsmith,Josué E Pineda,Sayan Alekseev,Elise Alspach,Kenneth H Hu,Marco Colonna,Kristen E Pauken,Ken Chen,Matthew M Gubin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114875
2024-10-23
Abstract:The goal of therapeutic cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) is to promote T cells with anti-tumor capabilities. Here, we compared mutant neoantigen (neoAg) peptide-based vaccines with ICT in preclinical models. NeoAg vaccines induce the most robust expansion of proliferating and stem-like PD-1+TCF-1+ neoAg-specific CD8 T cells in tumors. Anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1 ICT promotes intratumoral TCF-1- neoAg-specific CD8 T cells, although their phenotype depends in part on the specific ICT used. Anti-CTLA-4 also prompts substantial changes to CD4 T cells, including induction of ICOS+Bhlhe40+ T helper 1 (Th1)-like cells. Although neoAg vaccines or ICTs expand iNOS+ macrophages, neoAg vaccines maintain CX3CR1+CD206+ macrophages expressing the TREM2 receptor, unlike ICT, which suppresses them. TREM2 blockade enhances neoAg vaccine efficacy and is associated with fewer CX3CR1+CD206+ macrophages and induction of neoAg-specific CD8 T cells. Our findings highlight different mechanisms underlying neoAg vaccines and different forms of ICT and identify combinatorial therapies to enhance neoAg vaccine efficacy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?