Abstract:Background and Aim User participation is a prerequisite for receiving research funding in healthcare in Norway. Despite many positive benefits, studies report challenges from users' and researchers' perspectives. Limited knowledge exists concerning researchers' experiences in scenarios where the users are professionals within healthcare and research. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore and reflect on personal experiences as researchers from a process of planning and developing research questions for a PhD project, following the James Lind Alliance guidelines, which were a requirement for funding. We focused on how the process of collaboration with a specific group of users influenced the researchers' sense of selves. Design and Method We used a qualitative design based on collaborative autoethnography, exploring personal experiences from a sociocultural point of view. Two of the three researchers in the team recollected their experiences from the user involvement process while applying the James Lind Alliance guidelines. We used different data sources to develop two autoethnographic narratives. The narratives were analysed using thematic analysis. Results The autoethnographic narratives demonstrate the complexity of user involvement from the researchers' perspectives. We identified four themes in the analysis: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, competing paradigms, hierarchy and dual roles. The accounts illustrated the researchers' ambivalence within the process, indicating that they feared a loss of control over the direction of the research project. The narratives visualised a struggle to appear as credible researchers, illustrating how the involvement of a specific group of users and adherence to a specific guideline for user involvement influenced the researchers' experiences of their roles and identities in the collaboration. Conclusion The results point to the relevance of the sociocultural backdrop; researchers might become frontline providers of policy implementation in research, balancing tensions between regulatory constraints, user involvement and researchers' professional identity and research ideals, when a specific, detailed procedure for user involvement is required. Patient or Public Contribution Two user panels comprising participants from clinical practice, education and research, along with a service user, collaborated in the planning and development of research questions for a PhD project. This autoethnographic study elaborates this process.

Crossing disciplinary boundaries: An ethnographic exploration of academic publishing invitations

Academic Publishing: Making the Implicit Explicit

"The best home for this paper": A qualitative study of how authors select where to submit manuscripts

David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system

Peripheral Multilingual Scholars Confronting Epistemic Exclusion in Global Academic Knowledge Production: a Positive Case Study

Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues"

Understanding Author Choices in the Current Conservation Publishing Landscape

Why publish? An interview study exploring patient innovators' reasons for and experiences of scientific publishing

The Emergence of Epistemic Agency in Researching Multilingually: an Autoethnography of a Chinese Researcher's Academic Publishing Practices

Towards A Philosophy of Academic Publishing

How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study

Including Early Career Researchers in Scientific Publishing

Early Career Researchers: Scholarly Behaviour and the Prospect of Change

Between Public Guidelines for User Involvement and Ideals About Free Research: Using Collaborative Autoethnography to Explore Researcher Experiences From a User Involvement Process

Road to International Publications: an Empirical Study of Chinese Communication Scholars

Theorising Support for Interdisciplinary Early-Career Researchers Using Communicative Genre and 'Rules of the Game'

Publishing while editor: Transparency and behaviour in public administration journals

Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors

Collaborative Moments. Expanding the Anthropological Field through Cross-Disciplinary Practice

Reflecting on Motivations: How Reasons to Publish affect Research Behaviour in Astronomy

Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions