Two scholarly publishing cultures? Open access drives a divergence in European academic publishing practices

Leon Kopitar,Nejc Plohl,Mojca Tancer Verboten,Gregor Štiglic,Roger Watson,Dean Korošak

2024-11-10

Abstract:The current system of scholarly publishing is often criticized for being slow, expensive, and not transparent. The rise of open access publishing as part of open science tenets, promoting transparency and collaboration, together with calls for research assesment reforms are the results of these criticisms. The emergence of new open access publishers presents a unique opportunity to empirically test how universities and countries respond to shifts in the academic publishing landscape. These new actors challenge traditional publishing models, offering faster review times and broader accessibility, which could influence strategic publishing decisions. Our findings reveal a clear division in European publishing practices, with countries clustering into two groups distinguished by the ratio of publications in new open access journals with accelerated review times versus legacy journals. This divide underscores a broader shift in academic culture, highlighting new open access publishing venues as a strategic factor influencing national and institutional publishing practices, with significant implications for research accessibility and collaboration across Europe.

Digital Libraries,Computers and Society,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the differences in publishing cultures existing in the academic publishing field and their impacts. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects:

1. **Transformation of academic publishing models**:
- The competition and co - existence between traditional academic publishing models (such as high - impact journals) and emerging Open Access (OA) publishing models.
- Emerging OA publishers (such as MDPI) offer faster review times and broader access rights, which pose a challenge to traditional publishing models.

2. **Impacts of publishing choices on scientific research behaviors**:
- The pressures faced by researchers when choosing publishing platforms, including factors such as publication speed, journal reputation, and transparency.
- How researchers in different countries and institutions adjust their publishing strategies according to policy changes and incentive mechanisms.

3. **Polarization of publishing cultures**:
- The significant differences in academic publishing practices among European countries and universities, forming two different groups of publishing cultures.
- Whether such differences reflect broader socio - economic backgrounds, such as innovation potential and perception of corruption.

4. **Relationship between publishing choices and socio - economic factors**:
- Whether researchers' publishing choices are influenced by the socio - economic environment (such as innovation potential, perception of corruption, etc.) of the country or region where they are located.
- How these socio - economic factors shape the scientific research output and publishing habits of different countries and institutions.

5. **Impacts of publishing models on the scientific research evaluation system**:
- Whether the current scientific research evaluation system based on journal impact factors and the number of publications is reasonable, and the impacts of this evaluation system on the quality of scientific research and social influence.
- How to promote open science and research integrity by adjusting evaluation criteria.

By analyzing the publishing data of European countries and universities, the paper reveals the polarization phenomenon of academic publishing cultures and explores the socio - economic and institutional reasons behind this phenomenon. Ultimately, the paper aims to provide references for future scientific research evaluation and publishing policies, in order to promote a more fair, transparent, and efficient academic exchange environment.