Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

The Present State and Impact of AI-Driven Computational Tools for Predicting Plant Protein Structures

Computational Identification Of Potential Molecular Interactions In Arabidopsis

AI-Based Protein Structure Prediction in Drug Discovery: Impacts and Challenges

Modeling to Understand Plant Protein Structure-Function Relationships—Implications for Seed Storage Proteins

Prediction of protein structure and AI

Targeting plant UBX proteins: AI-enhanced lessons from distant cousins

Recent Advances and Challenges in Protein Structure Prediction

Proteomics of model and crop plant species: Status, current limitations and strategic advances for crop improvement

AI told you so: navigating protein structure prediction in the era of machine learning

AI-Driven Deep Learning Techniques in Protein Structure Prediction

Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction

Exploring crop genomes: assembly features, gene prediction accuracy, and implications for proteomics studies

Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein–protein interactions

CPIELA: Computational Prediction of Plant Protein–Protein Interactions by Ensemble Learning Approach From Protein Sequences and Evolutionary Information

The prospects and opportunities of protein structure prediction with AI

AI-powered revolution in plant sciences: advancements, applications, and challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

Artificial intelligence in fusion protein three-dimensional structure prediction: Review and perspective

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

PredPSP: a novel computational tool to discover pathway-specific photosynthetic proteins in plants

Advances in AI for Protein Structure Prediction: Implications for Cancer Drug Discovery and Development