Abstract:A stimulus that predicts the delivery of a specific food outcome can bias performance towards instrumental actions that earn that same outcome in a phenomenon known as specific Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT). The precise mechanism by which the specific instrumental action is selected under these circumstances has remained elusive. The present set of experiments explored whether treatments that undermine the response-outcome (R-O) association also affect the expression of specific PIT. Consistent with previous work, in Experiment 1 we showed that specific PIT remains intact after an instrumental degradation treatment that attempted to undermine R-O associations. However, we additionally demonstrated that outcome-devaluation sensitivity also persisted after degradation, suggesting that R-O associations were impervious to the degradation treatment, and precluding any conclusions about the necessity of R-O associations for specific PIT expression. Nevertheless, given the two-lever two-outcome design of this experiment it is possible that R-O associations were indeed undermined by degradation and that the devaluation effect was driven by distinct, incidental Pavlovian lever-outcome associations. To nullify the obscuring effects of these incidental Pavlovian associations, we used a bidirectional lever for instrumental conditioning that could be pushed to the left or the right for distinct outcomes. In Experiment 2 we demonstrated that specific PIT could be observed on this bidirectional manipulandum whether the subjects were hungry or sated, consistent with the literature. The critical third Experiment used an identical design to Experiment 1 except that the two instrumental responses were made on the single bidirectional manipulanda. Here, specific PIT was intact after instrumental degradation and, crucially, we saw no evidence of outcome devaluation sensitivity in these same subjects, suggesting that the R-O associations were weakened or undermined by this treatment. We conclude that the expression of specific PIT is resistant to treatments that undermine R-O associations and disrupt value based choice, and discuss how these findings contribute to our understanding of the associative framework supporting behavioral control.

Outcome devaluation as a method for identifying goal-directed behaviors in rats

Response-independent outcome presentations dissociate stimulus and value based choice

You are How You Eat: Foraging Behavior as a Potential Novel Marker of Rat Affective State

Using sign tracking to experimentally increase self‐control in rats

Effects of outcome revaluation on attentional prioritisation of reward-related stimuli

Effect of context on the instrumental reinforcer devaluation effect produced by taste-aversion learning.

Manipulations of the context-response relationship reduce the expression of response habits

Rats' performance in a suboptimal choice procedure implemented in a natural-foraging analogue

Behavioral Representation of Cost and Benefit Balance in Rats

Validation and Optimisation of a Touchscreen Progressive Ratio Test of Motivation in Male Rats

Rats pursue food and leisure following the same rational principles

Stimulus conditions that promote habitual control

Triggered Temptations: A New Procedure to Compare Reward-Seeking Behaviour Induced by Discriminative and Conditioned Stimuli in Rats

Measuring Motivation and Reward‐Related Decision Making in the Rodent Operant Touchscreen System

Devaluation of response-produced safety signals reveals circuits for goal-directed versus habitual avoidance in dorsal striatum

An Open-Source Platform for Head-Fixed Operant and Consummatory Behavior

Punishment Risk Task: Monitoring anxiogenic states during goal directed actions in mice

A Novel Weight Lifting Task for Investigating Effort and Persistence in Rats

Delay Discounting and Impulsive Choice in the Rat.

Validation of a touchscreen probabilistic reward task for mice: A reverse-translated assay with cross-species continuity