Devaluation of response-produced safety signals reveals circuits for goal-directed versus habitual avoidance in dorsal striatum

Robert M. Sears,Erika C. Andrade,Shanna B. Samels,Lindsay C. Laughlin,Danielle M. Moloney,Donald A. Wilson,Matthew R. Alwood,Justin M. Moscarello,Christopher K. Cain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.07.579321
2024-02-13
Abstract:Active avoidance responses (ARs) are instrumental behaviors that prevent harm. Adaptive ARs may contribute to active coping, whereas maladaptive avoidance habits are implicated in anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders. The AR learning mechanism has remained elusive, as successful avoidance trials produce no obvious reinforcer. We used a novel outcome-devaluation procedure in rats to show that ARs are positively reinforced by response-produced feedback (FB) cues that develop into safety signals during training. Males were sensitive to FB-devaluation after moderate training, but not overtraining, consistent with a transition from goal-directed to habitual avoidance. Using chemogenetics and FB-devaluation, we also show that goal-directed vs. habitual ARs depend on dorsomedial vs. dorsolateral striatum, suggesting a significant overlap between the mechanisms of avoidance and rewarded instrumental behavior. Females were insensitive to FB-devaluation due to a remarkable context-dependence of counterconditioning. However, degrading the AR-FB contingency suggests that both sexes rely on safety signals to perform goal-directed ARs.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?