A deep-learning-based surrogate model for Monte-Carlo simulations of the linear energy transfer in primary brain tumor patients treated with proton-beam radiotherapy
Sebastian Starke,Aaron Kieslich,Martina Palkowitsch,Fabian Hennings,Esther G C Troost,Mechthild Krause,Jona Bensberg,Christian Hahn,Feline Heinzelmann,Christian Bäumer,Armin Lühr,Beate Timmermann,Steffen Löck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad64b7
IF: 3.5
2024-07-18
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Abstract:Objective: This study explores the use of neural networks (NNs) as surrogate models for Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations in predicting the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET d ) of protons in proton-beam therapy based on the planned dose distribution and patient anatomy in the form of computed tomography (CT) images. As LET d is associated with variability in the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, we also evaluate the implications of using NN predictions for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models within a variable-RBE context.
Approach: The predictive performance of three-dimensional NN architectures was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation on a cohort of brain tumor patients (n=151). The best-performing model was identified and externally validated on patients from a different center (n=107). LET d predictions were compared to MC-simulated results in clinically relevant regions of interest. We assessed the impact on NTCP models by leveraging LET d predictions to derive RBE-weighted doses, using the Wedenberg RBE model.
Main results: We found NNs based solely on the planned dose profile, i.e. without additional usage of CT images, can approximate MC-based LET d distributions. Root mean squared errors (RMSE) for the median LET d within the brain, brainstem, CTV, chiasm, lacrimal glands (ipsilateral/contralateral) and optic nerves (ipsilateral/contralateral) were 0.36, 0.87, 0.31, 0.73, 0.68, 1.04, 0.69 and 1.24~keV/μm, respectively. Although model predictions showed statistically significant differences from MC outputs, these did not result in substantial changes in NTCP predictions, with RMSEs of at most 3.2 percentage points.
Significance: The ability of NNs to predict LET d based solely on planned dose profiles suggests a viable alternative to the compute-intensive MC simulations in a variable-RBE setting. This is particularly useful in scenarios where MC simulation data are unavailable, facilitating resource-constrained proton therapy treatment planning, retrospective patient data analysis and further investigations on the variability of proton RBE.
engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging