The efficacy of an intracoronary cocktail administration in preventing no-reflow during excimer laser coronary angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: A pilot study. (ELCA- cocktail study)

Pan He,Haiwei Chen,Junjie Yang,Lei Gao,Jun Guo,Yundai Chen,Qi Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132666
2025-01-15
Abstract:Background: The no-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication during excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) procedures, which can lead to adverse outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of intracoronary administration of a cocktail solution comprising nitroglycerin, heparin, and verapamil on preventing no-reflow during ELCA in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: This study included patients undergoing ELCA with contrast infusion for ISR. Based on whether receiving the intracoronary cocktail solution during ELCA, participants were divided into two groups: the cocktail (+) group and the cocktail (-) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of no-reflow, which was defined as the cessation of blood flow into the distal coronary artery in the absence of a clear angiographic explanation for impairment of flow. Results: A total of 54 lesions in 51 patients were included. The mean age of the study population was 61.8 ± 9.7 years, with 84.3 % male. Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly lower in the cocktail (+) group compared to the cocktail (-) group (0 % vs. 17.9 %, P = 0.024). No cases of hypotension, major bleeding or coronary perforation in either group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6-month were no significant difference between the groups (4.0 % vs. 3.8 %, P = 0.977). Conclusions: The pilot study suggests that intracoronary administration of a cocktail comprising heparin, nitroglycerin, and verapamil may reduce the incidence of no-reflow during ELCA in patients with ISR. However, given the limited sample size and the non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation needs to be confirmed through multicenter studies with larger sample sizes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?