Effects of different route of intracoronary infusion of verapamil on no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

dexiu huang,j y qian,l ge,q b wang,bing fan,yun yan,feng zhang,j y ma,k yao,junbo ge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht309.P3974
IF: 39.3
2013-01-01
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Purpose: Intracoronary infusion of verapamil can reverse no-reflow phenomenon during primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). The study was designed to compare angiographic and clinical outcomes in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI with no-reflow phenomenon using two different route of intracoronary infusion of verapamil. Methods: From 2010 to 2012, no-reflow phenomenon (TIMI flow grade<3) after stenting was observed in 98 patients who underwent primary PCI for ST-segment elevation AMI and received the manual intracoronary bolus infusion of verapamil for reversal of no-reflow. According to the route of intracoronary infusion of verapamil, the 98 patients were divided into the guiding catheter group (GC, n=48) and the selective catheter group (SC, n=50). In the SC group, the drug was infused via a microcatheter or thrombus-aspiration catheter distal to the angioplasty site. Pre-PCI, post-PCI and after drugs were given, the coronary flow was assessed using TIMI flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC). The ECG ST-segment resolution and troponin T concentrations were also measured closely. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) through echocardiography and NT-proBNP levels were measured at 1 and 30 days post-PCI. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, MI and target vessel revascularization were calculated at 30 days post-PCI. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in demographic data of patients, procedural characteristics and the baseline coronary flow post-stenting in the two groups. The average intracoronary infusion dose of verapamil was 0.6mg in the GC group and 0.3mg in the SC group (p<0.05). The selective infusing could improve the coronary flow more effectively than through guiding catheter in cTFC (p<0.05). More patients restored the TIMI-3 flow after drug infusion in the SC group than the GC group (p<0.05). Compared with the GC group, the SC group had more complete ST-segment resolution at 3 hours after PCI, lower peak troponin T level, and lower NT-proBNP levels at 1 and 30 days after PCI (p<0.05). During 30 days follow-up, the LVEF and incidence of MACE were similar between the two groups. After drug infusion, the drop of systolic blood pressure and heart rate in the GC group was greater than that in the SC group (p<0.05). Conclusions: The intracoronary infusion of verapamil through selective catheter can reverse no-reflow phenomenon more effectively and safely than through guiding catheter during primary PCI for AMI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?