Abstract:The $\Lambda$CDM model faces several tensions with recent cosmological data and their increased accuracy. The mismatch between the values of the Hubble constant $H_0$ obtained from direct distance ladder measurements and from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the most statistically significant, but the amplitude of the matter fluctuations is also regarded as a serious concern, leading to the investigation of a plethora of models. We first show that the combination of several recent measurements from local probes leads to a tight constraint on the present-day matter density $\Omega_M$ as well as on the amplitude of the matter fluctuations, both acceptably consistent with the values inferred from the CMB. Secondly, we show that the data on cosmic chronometers allow to derive an accurate value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ for $\Lambda$CDM models: $H_0 = 67.4 \pm 1.34$ km/s/Mpc. This implies that, within $\Lambda$CDM, some determinations of $H_0$ are biased. Considering a bias on the Hubble constant as a nuisance parameter within $\Lambda$CDM, we examine such a $\Lambda$CDM$+ H_0$ bias model on the same statistical grounds as alternative cosmological models. We show that the former statistically supersede most existing extended models proposed up to now. In a third step, we show that the value of $\Omega_M$ we obtained, combined with $H_0$ from SH0ES, leads to an accurate measurement of $\omega_M$, providing an additional low-redshift test for cosmological models. From this test, most extensions seem to be confronted with a new tension, whereas the $\Lambda$CDM with $H_0 \sim 67 $ has none. We conclude that a standard $\Lambda$CDM model with an unknown bias in the Cepheids distance calibration represents a model that reaches a remarkable agreement, statistically better than previously proposed extensions with $H_0 \sim 73 $ for which such a comparison can be performed. (abridged)

Probing Cosmic Background Dynamics with a Cosmological-model-independent Method

Probing Cosmic Background Dynamics with a Cosmological-model-independent Method

A doublet of cosmological models to challenge the H0 tension in the Pantheon Supernovae Ia catalog

Pantheon+ tomography and Hubble tension

Investigating The Hubble Tension Through Hubble Parameter Data

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

The Pantheon Sample analysis of cosmological constraints under new models

Constraints on Cosmological Models from Hubble Parameters Measurements

Model-independent test of the running Hubble constant from the type Ia supernovae and the Hubble parameter data

Alleviating the Hubble-constant tension and the growth tension via a transition of absolute magnitude favored by the Pantheon+ sample

Hints of new physics for the Hubble tension: violation of cosmological principle

$Λ$CDM is alive and well

On Redshift Evolution & Negative Dark Energy Density in Pantheon+ Supernovae

No-go guide for the Hubble tension: late-time or local-scale new physics

The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

A robust assessment of the local anisotropy of the Hubble constant

The trouble with $H_0$

Tensions with the flat $\boldsymbolΛ$CDM model from high-redshift cosmography

Model independent expansion history from supernovae: Cosmology versus systematics