Abstract:Context . The cosmological concordance model (ΛCDM) is the current standard model in cosmology thanks to its ability to reproduce the observations. The first observational evidence for this model appeared roughly 20 years ago from the type-Ia supernovae (SNIa) Hubble diagram from two different groups. However, there has been some debate in the literature concerning the statistical treatment of SNIa, and their stature as proof of cosmic acceleration. Aims . In this paper we relax the standard assumption that SNIa intrinsic luminosity is independent of redshift, and examine whether it may have an impact on our cosmological knowledge and more precisely on the accelerated nature of the expansion of the universe. Methods . To maximise the scope of this study, we do not specify a given cosmological model, but we reconstruct the expansion rate of the universe through a cubic spline interpolation fitting the observations of the different cosmological probes: SNIa, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and the high-redshift information from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Results . We show that when SNIa intrinsic luminosity is not allowed to vary as a function of redshift, cosmic acceleration is definitely proven in a model-independent approach. However, allowing for redshift dependence, a nonaccelerated reconstruction of the expansion rate is able to fit, at the same level of ΛCDM, the combination of SNIa and BAO data, both treating the BAO standard ruler r d as a free parameter (not entering on the physics governing the BAO), and adding the recently published prior from CMB observations. We further extend the analysis by including the CMB data. In this case we also consider a third way to combine the different probes by explicitly computing r d from the physics of the early universe, and we show that a nonaccelerated reconstruction is able to nicely fit this combination of low- and high-redshift data. We also check that this reconstruction is compatible with the latest measurements of the growth rate of matter perturbations. We finally show that the value of the Hubble constant ( H 0 ) predicted by this reconstruction is in tension with model-independent measurements. Conclusions . We present a model-independent reconstruction of a nonaccelerated expansion rate of the universe that is able to fit all the main background cosmological probes nicely. However, the predicted value of H 0 is in tension with recent direct measurements. Our analysis points out that a final reliable and consensual value for H 0 is critical to definitively prove cosmic acceleration in a model-independent way.

Model independent expansion history from supernovae: Cosmology versus systematics

Model-independent Constraints on Type Ia Supernova Light-curve Hyperparameters and Reconstructions of the Expansion History of the Universe

Model-independent cosmic acceleration and redshift-dependent intrinsic luminosity in type-Ia supernovae

Probing Cosmic Background Dynamics with a Cosmological-model-independent Method

Non-Gaussian Likelihoods for Type Ia Supernovae Cosmology: Implications for Dark Energy and $H_0$

Uncorrelated Measurements of the Cosmic Expansion History and Dark Energy from Supernovae

Cosmological foundations revisited with Pantheon+

Model-independent Test of the Cosmic Anisotropy with Inverse Distance Ladder

Model-independent cosmological inference post DESI DR1 BAO measurements

Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data

On redshift evolution and negative dark energy density in Pantheon + Supernovae

On Redshift Evolution & Negative Dark Energy Density in Pantheon+ Supernovae

A robust assessment of the local anisotropy of the Hubble constant

An improved model-independent assessment of the late-time cosmic expansion

Revisiting progenitor-age dependence of type Ia supernova luminosity standardization process

No evidence for missing covariance in the Pantheon+ SuperNova sample distance moduli

Tensions with the flat $\boldsymbolΛ$CDM model from high-redshift cosmography

Model independent estimation of expansion rate from low and high redshift SNIa

Looking for signs of Anisotropic Cosmological Expansion in the High-z Supernova data

Determining Cosmological-model-independent $H_0$ with Gravitationally Lensed Supernova Refsdal