The frequency of osteomyelitis after pressure injury in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ehsan Jangholi,Seyed Danail Alizadeh,Farzin Farahbakhsh,Vali Baigi,Zahra Ghodsi,Pouya Mahdavi Sharif,Shahriar Ghashghaei,Mahkameh Abbaszadeh,Arman Zeinaddini Meymand,Zahra Eskandari,Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00685-8
2024-10-14
Abstract:Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis OBJECTIVE: To determine the global frequency of osteomyelitis in individuals with spinal cord injury who have pressure injuries (SCI-PI). Methods: A comprehensive search on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Web of Science has been conducted until November 2023. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews was followed. Cohort and cross-sectional studies included SCI-PI participants who reported the frequency of osteomyelitis without language restriction. Data extraction was performed by four reviewers in two groups. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for quality assessment. The Chi-squared and I2 tests were applied to detect heterogeneity between studies. Also, a random-effects model was performed for the report data. Results: Ten out of 986 studies met our eligibility criteria, with 492 SCI-PI individuals. It was discovered that most SCIs were thoracolumbar injuries and male. There was a history of PI in more than half the patients. SCI was primarily caused by trauma. A meta-analysis revealed a significantly heterogeneous 43.0% osteomyelitis frequency. There was no evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analysis based on study quality revealed that the frequency of osteomyelitis in low-quality studies was 34.5%, whereas the frequency in high-quality research was 47.4%. Furthermore, the overall frequency of osteomyelitis was 29.0% in the subgroup analysis of research carried out in the USA. Conclusions: Our study highlights the significant burden of osteomyelitis among SCI-PI individuals. These findings underscore the pressing need for standardized diagnostic and management protocols to mitigate the morbidity associated with osteomyelitis in this vulnerable population.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?