Enhancement of electron-induced X-ray intensity for single particles under grazing-exit conditions

K. Tsuji,Z. Spolnik,K. Wagatsuma,Jing Zhang,R. Grieken

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0584-8547(99)00073-7

1999-08-09

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Pressure ulcers acquired during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury, characterization and predictors: A 15-years' experience

Alejandro García-Rudolph,Mark Andrew Wright,Emilien Amar Devilleneuve,Eulalia Castillo,Eloy Opisso,Elena Hernandez-Pena

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-230234

2024-04-17

Neurorehabilitation

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Most studies focus on the risk factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) during acute phase or community care for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to i) compare clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients after SCI with PUs acquired during rehabilitation vs inpatients without PUs and ii) evaluate an existing PU risk assessment tool iii) identify first PU predictors. METHODS: Individuals (n = 1,135) admitted between 2008 and 2022 to a rehabilitation institution within 60 days after SCI were included. Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and mEntal state, Mobility, Incontinence, Nutrition, Activity (EMINA) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were fitted. RESULTS: Overall incidence of PUs was 8.9%. Of these, 40.6% occurred in the first 30 days, 47.5% were sacral, 66.3% were Stage II. Patients with PUs were older, mostly with traumatic injuries (67.3%), AIS A (54.5%), lower FIM motor (mFIM) score and mechanical ventilation. We identified specific mFIM items to increase EMINA specificity. Adjusted Cox model yielded sex (male), age at injury, AIS grade, mFIM and diabetes as PUs predictors (C-Index = 0.749). CONCLUSION: Inpatients can benefit from combined assessments (EMINA + mFIM) and clinical features scarcely addressed in previous studies to prevent PUs.

clinical neurology,rehabilitation
Predictors of pressure ulcer incidence following traumatic spinal cord injury: a secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal study

D Brienza,S Krishnan,P Karg,G Sowa,A L Allegretti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2017.96

2017-09-12

Spinal Cord

Abstract:Study design:Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study.Objectives:The objective of this study was to identify the medical and demographic factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers during acute-care hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation following acute spinal cord injury.Setting:The study was carried out at acute hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient rehabilitation sites at a university medical center in the United States.Methods:Adults with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (n=104) were recruited within 24–72 h of admission to the hospital. Pressure ulcer incidence was recorded.Results:Thirty-nine participants out of 104 (37.5%) developed at least one pressure ulcer during acute-care hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed significant association of pressure ulcer incidence for those with pneumonia and mechanical ventilation (P=0.01) and higher injury severity (ASIA A) (P=0.01). Multiple logistic regression showed that the odds of formation of a first pressure ulcer in participants with ASIA A was 4.5 times greater than that for participants with ASIA B, CI (1–20.65), P=0.05, and 4.6 times greater than that for participants with ASIA C, CI (1.3–16.63), P=0.01.Conclusion:Among individuals with acute traumatic SCI, those with high-injury severity were at an increased risk to develop pressure ulcers. Pneumonia was noted to be associated with the formation of pressure ulcers.

clinical neurology,rehabilitation
Pressure ulcer risk factors in persons with SCI: part I: acute and rehabilitation stages

A Gélis,A Dupeyron,P Legros,C Benaïm,J Pelissier,C Fattal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.107

2008-09-02

Spinal Cord

Abstract:Background:Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a common complication following a spinal-cord injury (SCI). Good prevention requires identifying the individuals at risk for developing PUs. Risk assessment scales used nowadays were designed on pathophysiological concepts and are not SCI-specific. Recently, an epidemiological approach to PU risk factors has been proposed to design an SCI-specific assessment tool. The first results seem quite disappointing, probably becuase of the level of evidence of the risk factors used.Objective:To determine PU risk factors correlated to the patients with SCI, medical care management during the acute as well as in the rehabilitation and chronic stages. This first part focuses on identifying the risk factors during the acute and rehabilitation stages.Materials and methods:Systematic review of the literature.Results:Six studies met our inclusion criteria. The risk factors during the acute stage of an SCI are essentially linked to care management and treatment modalities. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation on medical risk factors, except for low blood pressure on admission to the Emergency Room, with a moderate level of evidence. Regarding the rehabilitation stage, no study was deemed relevant.Discussion and conclusions:Additional observational studies are needed, for both the acute and rehabilitation stages, to improve this level of evidence. However, this systematic review unveiled the need for a carefully assessed t care management and the related practices, especially during the acute stage of an SCI.

clinical neurology,rehabilitation
The Prevalence, Incidence, And Associated Factors Of Pressure Injuries Among Immobile Inpatients: A Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Descriptive Study In China

Ying Liu,Xinjuan Wu,Yufen Ma,Zhen Li,Jing Cao,Jing Jiao,Ge Liu,Fangfang Li,Baoyun Song,Jingfen Jin,Yilan Liu,Xianxiu Wen,Shouzhen Cheng,Frances Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13054

2019-01-01

International Wound Journal

Abstract:The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, incidence, and the associated factors of pressure injuries (PIs) among immobile hospitalised patients in China. Being immobile during hospitalisation put these patients at a higher risk of PIs. There is little literature about pressure injury (PI) prevalence or PI incidence in immobile hospitalised patients in hospitals in China. This was a multicentre, cross-sectional, exploratory descriptive study. A total of 23 985 immobile patients were recruited from 25 general hospitals in six provinces of China from November 1, 2015 to March 18, 2016. Information was collected on demographic characteristics, physical assessment information, and treatment and nursing care measures. The PI period prevalence was 3.38%, and the PI cumulative incidence was 1.23%. Most PIs (84.03%) were Stage 1 or Stage 2. A total of 48.22% of PIs occurred in the sacrum or heel region. In the multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with higher PI prevalence: age, gender, length of immobility, type of hospital, modified Braden Scale score, urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, low serum albumin, the usage of fixation or restraint devices, and patient's discharge diagnosis (lower limb fracture, malnutrition, and spinal cord injury). PI prevalence for immobile hospitalised patients in the study was lower than those reported in literature. However, because of the large population in China, the number of patients who suffer with PIs can be very high. The relating factors of higher PI prevalence identified in this study were consistent with current literature. Patients with a higher number of these associated factors should be monitored more closely, and preventative measures should be taken to prevent PI occurrence in high-risk populations.
Saudi Arabian adult intensive care unit pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors: a prospective cohort study

Nahla Tayyib,Fiona Coyer,Peter Lewis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12406

2015-02-09

International Wound Journal

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to identify pressure ulcer (PU) incidence and risk factors that are associated with PU development in patients in two adult intensive care units (ICU) in Saudi Arabia. A prospective cohort study design was used. A total of 84 participants were screened second daily basis until discharge or death, over a consecutive 30-day period, out of which 33 participants with new PUs were identified giving a cumulative hospital-acquired PU incidence of 39·3% (33/84 participants). The incidence of medical devices-related PUs was 8·3% (7/84). Age, length of stay in the ICU, history of cardiovascular disease and kidney disease, infrequent repositioning, time of operation, emergency admission, mechanical ventilation and lower Braden Scale scores independently predicted the development of a PU. According to binary logistic regression analyses, age, longer stay in ICU and infrequent repositioning were significant predictors of all stages of PUs, while the length of stay in the ICU and infrequent repositioning were associated with the development of stages II-IV PUs. In conclusion, PU incidence rate was higher than that reported in other international studies. This indicates that urgent attention is required for PU prevention strategies in this setting.

dermatology,surgery
Prevalence and prediction of pressure ulcers in admitted stroke patients in a tertiary care hospital

Jamila Farid,Rabbia Amin,Muhammad Aman Sheikh,Muhammad Irfan,Raed AlRuwaili,Mubarak Alruwaili,Naif H Ali,Anas Mohammad Albarrak,Saifur Rahman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.07.010

Abstract:Pressure ulcer (PU) is a localized injury to the skin or underlying tissues usually over a bony prominence, which results due to pressure or pressure in combination with shear. It is an expensive health care problem that have deterring impact on the length of hospitalization and cause extra nursing care time. Moreover, PUs negatively impacts patients' health related quality of life. High PUs prevalence figures were found in specialized hospital units such as intensive care unit (ICU), orthopedics, surgery, and also in stroke patients in medical units. The major purpose of this study is to assess the frequency of pressure ulcers in stroke patients at Ayub teaching hospital. The methodology used for carrying out the research was cross-sectional study conducted during months of September, October, and November 2020. Questionnaire was used to collect the data and well-informed written consent was taken from the patients. A total of 120 stroke patients were initially included with the intention to study the frequency of PUs among them. Different age groups were taken but majority (48.3%) belonged to the age group 31-60 years. Maximum patients were hypertensive (65%), while few of them were diabetic (35%). From the results of proposed work, it is found that out of 120 stroke patients, 75.8% presented with ischemic stroke while 24.2% presented with hemorrhagic stroke. 8.3% that is 10 out of 120 stroke patients developed pressure ulcers of grade 1 (1.7%), grade 2 (1.7%), grade 3 (2.5%), and grade 4 (2.5%) mostly in the sacral region (6.7%) and also on ankle (0.8%), and shoulder (0.8%) respectively. Patients in the study group had unsatisfactory hygiene (6.7%) were malnourished (11.7%) and were not using preventive mattresses (79.2%). Those at the risk of developing pressure ulcers were not being repositioned (6.7%) and did not had awareness (10%). Prevention and treatment used in ward is 100%. Conclusively, the frequency of pressure ulcers in stroke patients was determined to be 8.3% and the most frequent localization was sacrum. The PU care in this hospital is appropriate but still could be improved further by improving risk assessment, prevention specially use of air mattress and patient education regarding PUs. The main objective of the study is to identify the frequency of PUs in stroke patients and to highlight various factors that would avoid PUs development.
Pressure ulcer development in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke

Esin Derin Cicek,Ayper Önal Alkan,Nihan Parasiz Yukselen,Yılmaz Onal,Hakki Muammer Karakas,Ahmet Vural

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.0331

2024-06-08

Journal of Wound Care

Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and to evaluate comorbid/confounding factors. Method: The study included patients treated for AIS who were divided into three treatment groups: those receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy (tPA); patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT); and those receiving both tPA and MT. PUs were classified according to the international classification system and factors that may influence their development were investigated. Results: A total of 242 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PUs in patients treated for AIS was 7.4%. Most PUs were located on the sacrum (3.7%), followed by the gluteus (3.3%) and trochanter (2.9%). With regards to PU classification: 29% were stage I; 34% were stage II; and the remainder were stage III. Age was not a significant factor in the development of PUs (p=0.172). Patients in the tPA group had a lower PU incidence (2.3%) than patients in the tPA+MT group (15.7%) and MT group (12.1%) (p=0.001). Patients with PUs had a longer period of hospitalisation (18.5±11.92 days) than patients without a PU (8.0±8.52 days) (p=0.000). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission were higher in patients with PUs than in patients without a PU (14.33±4.38 versus 11.08±5.68, respectively; p=0.010). The difference in presence of comorbidities between patients with and without PUs (p=0.922) and between treatment groups (p=0.677) were not statistically significant. The incidence of PUs was higher in patients requiring intensive care, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.089). Conclusion: In this study, patients treated for AIS with high NIHSS scores at admission and/or receiving MT were at higher risk for PUs, and so particular attention should be given to these patients in order to prevent PU development.

dermatology
The Changing Prevalence of Pressure Injury among Ontarians with SCI/D at Rehabilitation Admission: Opportunities for Improvement

Beverley Catharine Craven,Emma A. Bateman,Heather Flett,Farnoosh Farahani,Dalton L. Wolfe,Sussan Askari,Maryam Omidvar,Mohammad Alavinia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12111084

2024-05-25

Health Care

Abstract:Background: Despite preventability, 20–50% of patients with acute spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) develop hospital-acquired pressure injuries (PIs). The Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium (SCI IEQCC) aimed to mitigate PI risk through patient-reported daily skin checks alongside usual care. Methods: This quality improvement initiative utilized an interrupted time series design, encompassing adults ≥ 18 years admitted for inpatient rehabilitation across five Ontario sites from 2020 to 2023. Patient demographics, etiology, and impairment data were obtained from a national registry, while participating sites gathered data on PI onset, location, and severity. Run charts depicted temporal trends, and statistical analyses, including chi-square and logistic regression, compared patients with and without PIs. Results: Data from 1767 discharged SCI/D patients revealed that 26% had ≥1 PI, with 59% being prevalent and 41% incident. Most severe PIs (stages III and IV and unstageable) were acquired prior to admission. Process indicator fidelity was reasonable at 68%. Patients with PIs experienced longer hospital stays, lower Functional Independence Measure (FIM) changes, and FIM efficiency during rehabilitation. Conclusions: PI prevalence is increasing, particularly sacral injuries at admission, while incident cases have decreased since 2021 due to regular skin checks. This trend calls for proactive health system interventions to reduce costs and improve patient outcomes.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Among People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Suzanne L. Groah,Manon Schladen,Cynthia G. Pineda,Ching-Hui J. Hsieh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.11.014

2014-12-18

PM and R

Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the literature on the effectiveness of bed and wheelchair positioning and repositioning in the prevention of pressure ulcers (PUs) in both the spinal cord injury (SCI) and non-SCI populations.DESIGN: Systematic review.METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were queried with the subject heading terms "pressure sore," "pressure ulcer," "position or turn in bed, wheelchair," "pressure relief," and "pressure release." All study design types that assessed the effectiveness of bed and wheelchair positioning and pressure relief maneuvers in any patient group and in any setting were sought. Three independent reviewers extracted and summarized details of eligible trials using a standardized method. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of each trial using the American Academy of Neurology guidelines. When reviewers were not able to reach consensus, a third independent reviewer served as tiebreaker.RESULTS: We identified 2820 publications, of which 49 met inclusion criteria. Of these publications, the subject population was 2834 (923 persons with SCI, 717 persons without SCI, and 1194 healthy control subjects). Among studies examining pressure related to position or repositioning in bed or sitting, procedures for measuring skin pressure and metabolism were highly variable by anatomic location, measurement technique, outcome measure, study site, participant characteristics, and description of position/turning for bed and seated interventions. Numerous factors can influence tissue interface pressures, and no prospective studies had been performed to determine a causal relationship between interface pressure and skin breakdown. Several studies suggest that skin response to pressure differs between subjects with and without SCI. Conflicting results and insufficient evidence for optimal bed and seated positioning and turning and pressure relief maneuvers to prevent PUs in both SCI and non-SCI populations were limiting factors.CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no clear optimal positioning or turning frequency in bed, the evidence suggests avoiding the 90° lateral position because of high pressures and PU risk over the trochanters. During sitting, pressures are linearly redistributed from the sitting area during recline and tilt; however, reclining carries with it an increased risk of shear forces on this skin. The evidence does not support conclusive guidelines on positioning or repositioning techniques for PU prevention in bed or during sitting. We conclude that PU risk is highly individualized, with the SCI population at a higher risk, which demands flexible PU prevention strategies for bed/seated positioning and pressure relief maneuvers. Education has and will remain our most powerful ally to thwart this pervasive public health problem.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
Brain metabolism after 30 minutes of hypoxic or anoxic perfusion or ischemia.

D. Kintner,D. Costello,A. Levin,D. Gilboe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPENDO.1980.239.6.E501

1980-12-01

Abstract:In 48 separate experiments, isolated canine brain preparations were subjected to 30 min of either hypoxic (PaO2 congruent to 20 mmHg) perfusion, anoxic (PaO2 < 10 mmHg) perfusion, or total ischemia followed by reperfusion for up to 2 h with normal oxygenated blood. Unlike ischemia and anoxia, energy metabolism was sufficient during hypoxia to maintain substantial levels of ATP (48% of normal), sustain normal ion gradients, and prevent edema formation. Posthypoxia metabolism was adequate to clear accumulated lactate, enable recovery of normal tissue glucose levels, and allow return to normal levels of glycolytic intermediates. Although not as complete as that following hypoxia, recovery from cerebral edema and restoration of metabolism were better in ischemic than anoxic cortex. The reduced oxygen uptake in all groups during reoxygenation (55% of normal) indicates that all have a diminished capacity for energy metabolism. The ATP levels recovered more rapidly after 15 min of reoxygenation in the anoxic (57% of normal) than in the ischemic (21% of normal) group. Thus ATP does not appear to be directly related to recovery from edema.
Predictors of superficial and severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries: A cross-sectional study using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ survey

Susan A Kayser,Catherine A VanGilder,Charlie Lachenbruch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.003

Abstract:Background: Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries has declined over time. However, it is unknown if this decline is consistent for different stages of pressure injuries. It is also unknown if risk factors differ between superficial (stage 1 and 2) and severe (stage 3, 4, deep tissue, and unstageable) pressure injuries. Objective: To examine changes in prevalence of superficial and severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries from 2011 to 2016. To evaluate differences between risk factors associated with superficial versus severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries. Design: Retrospective analysis of the 2011-2016 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ data. Setting: Acute care hospitals in the USA. Participants: 216,626 patients had complete data. Methods: Prevalence of all, superficial, and severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries was calculated annually from 2011 to 2016 and linear trendlines were generated. Two logistic regressions examined risk factors for superficial and severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries. Results: Prevalence of superficial hospital-acquired pressure injuries declined significantly from 2011 to 2016. However, prevalence of severe pressure injuries did not show a reduction. Risk factors that significantly increased the risk of both superficial and severe pressure injuries were: increased age, male gender, unable to self-ambulate, all types of incontinence, additional linen layers, longer lengths of stay, and being in an intensive care unit. Body mass index (BMI) had a U-shaped relationship, where the likelihood of having either type of pressure injury was highest for low and high BMIs. Conclusions: A decline in superficial, but not severe, hospital-acquired pressure injuries suggests current prevention techniques might not adequately prevent severe pressure injuries. Generally, risk factors for superficial and severe pressure injuries were highly similar where all 14 of the risk factors were significant in both regression models. However, five risk factors in particular - ICU stay, presence of an ostomy, patient age, ambulatory status, and presence of a fecal management system - had substantially different effect sizes.
Pressure Injuries and the Waterlow Subscales in the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicentre Study

Hongxia Tao,Hongyan Zhang,Xinmian Kang,Yahan Wang,Yuxia Ma,Juhong Pei,Lin Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17526

2024-11-09

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract:Background Pressure injuries (PIs) impose a significant burden on patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the healthcare system. Assessing the risk of developing PIs is crucial for prevention. However, it is unclear whether all subscales of the Waterlow scale can be used to assess PIs risk in ICU. Objectives To assess whether all subscales of the Waterlow scale can predict PIs risk in ICU. Design Multicentre prospective study. Methods A total of 18,503 patients from ICUs in 40 tertiary‐level hospitals in Gansu province of China were enrolled from April 2021 to August 2023. The incidence and characteristics of PIs were recorded. Univariate Cox regression analyses were performed for each subscale as a predictor of PIs development, followed by multivariate Cox regression with covariates for each subscale separately. Results Out of 17,720 patients included, the incidence of PIs was 1.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed skin type (HR: 1.468, 95% CI: 1.229, 1.758), sex (HR: 0.655, 95% CI: 0.472, 0.908), advanced age (HR: 1.263, 95% CI: 1.106, 1.442), continence (HR: 1.245, 95% CI: 1.052, 1.473), tissue malnutrition (HR: 1.070, 95% CI: 1.007, 1.136) and neurological deficit (HR: 1.153, 95% CI: 1.062, 1.251) were independently predictive of PIs development for all participants. Skin type (HR: 2.326, 95% CI: 1.153, 3.010) (HR: 2.217, 95% CI: 1.804, 2.573) independently predicted PIs occurrence for high‐risk and very high‐risk group, respectively, while sex (HR: 0.634, 95% CI: 0.431, 0.931) and age (HR: 1.269, 95% CI: 1.083, 1.487) predicted PIs development for very high‐risk group. Conclusions This study found that not all subscales of the Waterlow scale are associated with the PIs development in patients in ICU, highlighting the importance of the skin type subscale in predicting PI risk across all patient groups. Implications for Clinical Practice Nurses need to focus on patient's skin and related (moisture, pain and pressure) conditions and take measures to promote skin health and avoid the occurrence of PI. Patient or Public Contribution None.

nursing
Pressure Ulcers During The Covid-19 Pandemic In Intensive Care:A Multicenter Cohort Study

Paulo Alves,Carina Bååth,Tânia Manuel,Sofia Almeida,Ulrika Källman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.06.007

IF: 3.374

2024-06-25

Journal of Tissue Viability

Abstract:Highlights • The overall prevalence of pressure ulcers (PUs) was 15.3% in the study population, with ICU-acquired PUs occurring at an incidence of 14.1%. • A majority of the pressure ulcers documented were located at the anterior part of the body (45.35%), and Category 2 ulcers accounted for 38.40% of cases, followed by Category 3 ulcers at 22.71%. • The presence of COVID-19 significantly increased the risk of developing a pressure ulcer, nearly doubling the risk compared to patients without COVID-19. • Age, COVID-19 infection, use of mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors, having a Braden risk score ≤ 16 at admission, and length of stay were identified as factors associated with the likelihood of developing an ICU-acquired PUs. Aim The objective of the present study is twofold: to describe the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) among ICU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify the risk factors associated with the development of PUs in this cohort of ICU patients. Materials and Methods Retrospective cohort study of adult critical care patients admitted in two general ICUs of two different countries (Sweden and Portugal) between March 1st, 2020, and April 30th, 2021, through the analysis of the electronic health record database. The prevalence and incidence were calculated, and a multivariate logistic-regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), of possible risk factors of PU development. Results The sample consisted of 1717 patients. The overall prevalence of PU was 15.3%, and the incidence of ICU-acquired PUs was 14.1%. Most of the pressure ulcers documented in this study were at the anterior part of the body (45.35%) and regarding classification, Category 2 (38.40%) and Category 3 (22.71%) pressure ulcers together accounted for over fifty percent of the cases recorded. In the multivariate logistic regression model for PU, age, having COVID-19 (OR= 1.58, 95% CI: 1.20 – 2.09), use of mechanical ventilation (OR= 1.49, 95% CI: 1.13 = 1.97), use of vasopressors (OR= 1.31, 95% CI: 1.00 – 1.70), having a Braden risk score ≤ 16 at admission (OR= 1.63; 95% CI: 1.04 – 2.56), and length of stay (LOS) (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 – 2.00 if LOS 90 – 260 hours, OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.63 – 3.35 if LOS > 260 hours) were associated with the likelihood of developing an ICU-acquired PUs. Conclusion When adjusted for covariates patients with COVID-19 had a higher risk for PU development during the ICU stay compared to patients without COVID-19. Health care personnel in ICU may consider incorporating COVID-19, age, use of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors and estimated LOS in addition to a comprehensive risk assessment including both a risk score and clinical assessment.

dermatology,nursing
Incidence and Risk Factors of Pressure Injuries in Surgical Spinal Patients

Yupei Zeng,Suzhen Huang,Jia-li Wu,X. Long,M. Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000570

2019-09-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the incidence and identify risk factors of pressure injury development during the perioperative period in patients undergoing spinal surgery requiring intraoperative positioning in the prone position. DESIGN: Review of medical records. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 3834 patients; 52.2% (n = 2006) were male and 65.5% (n = 2516) were older than 60 years. Most patients underwent surgery of the lumbosacral spinal segments (43.4%, n = 1667) followed by cervical (32.3%, n = 1241) and thoracic spinal segments (24.2%, n = 932). The study setting was the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiang XI Province in southeastern China. METHODS: We reviewed charts of patients who underwent spinal surgery requiring intraoperative positioning in the prone position from November 2013 to July 2016. Demographic data, Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk cumulative score (measured before preoperative transport), body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, preoperative time (time between preoperative transport from the inpatient unit to when the operation began), postoperative time (time between when the operation was over and postoperative transport to the inpatient unit), and development of any pressure injury were collected using a standardized form. Factors associated with an increased or decreased likelihood of pressure injury were initially evaluated with χ2 and independent t tests. Logistic regression was then used to identify potential risk factors for perioperative pressure injury in patients undergoing open spinal surgery requiring placement in the supine position during surgery. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four of 3840 patients (4.7%) developed pressure injuries. Multivariate analysis indicated that factors associated with intraoperative pressure injury development were older than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-2.17), BMI under 18 kg/m2 (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 4.05-5.21), cumulative Braden Scale score 13 or less (OR = 6.59, CI = 2.23-3.98), prolonged preoperative time (OR = 5.99, 95% CI = 3.21-6.12), and prolonged postoperative time (OR = 14.23, 95% CI = 10.23-21.19). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings we recommend extending preventive interventions for pressure injury to incorporate the time from preoperative transport to the surgical suite to inpatient care unit following surgery.

Medicine
Evaluation of the effectiveness of preventive nursing measures for pressure injuries in patients in the neurology intensive care unit

Rong Zhang,Peng-Xin Ma,Juan-Juan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3807

2024-07-06

World Journal of Clinical Cases

Abstract:BACKGROUND Patients in neurology intensive care units (ICU) are prone to pressure injuries (PU) due to factors such as severe illness, long-term bed rest, and physiological dysfunction. PU not only causes pain and complications to patients, but also increases medical burden, prolongs hospitalization time, and affects the recovery process. AIM To evaluate and optimize the effectiveness of pressure injury prevention nursing measures in neurology ICU patients. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted, and 60 patients who were admitted to the ICU of the Department of Neurology were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group according to the order of admission, with 30 people in each group. The observation group implemented pressure injury prevention and nursing measures, while the control group adopted routine care. RESULTS Comparison between observation and control groups following pressure injury prevention nursing intervention revealed significantly lower incidence rates in the observation group compared to the control group at 48 h (8.3% vs 26.7%), 7 d (16.7% vs 43.3%), and 14 d (20.0% vs 50.0%). This suggests a substantial reduction in pressure injury incidence in the observation group, with the gap widening over time. Additionally, patients in the observation group exhibited quicker recovery, with a shorter average time to get out of bed (48 h vs 72 h) and a shorter average length of stay (12 d vs 15 d) compared to the control group. Furthermore, post-intervention, patients in the observation group reported significantly improved quality of life scores, including higher scores in body satisfaction, feeling and function, and comfort (both psychological and physiological), indicating enhanced overall well-being and comfort following the implementation of pressure injury prevention nursing measures. CONCLUSION Implementing pressure injury preventive care measures for neurology ICU patients will have better results.

medicine, general & internal
The average cost of pressure ulcer management in a community dwelling spinal cord injury population

Brian C Chan,Natasha Nanwa,Nicole Mittmann,Dianne Bryant,Peter C Coyte,Pamela E Houghton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01002.x

2012-06-21

International Wound Journal

Abstract:Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a common secondary complication experienced by community dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). There is a paucity of literature on the health economic impact of PU in SCI population from a societal perspective. The objective of this study was to determine the resource use and costs in 2010 Canadian dollars of a community dwelling SCI individual experiencing a PU from a societal perspective. A non-comparative cost analysis was conducted on a cohort of community dwelling SCI individuals from Ontario, Canada. Medical resource use was recorded over the study period. Unit costs associated with these resources were collected from publicly available sources and published literature. Average monthly cost was calculated based on 7-month follow-up. Costs were stratified by age, PU history, severity level, location of SCI, duration of current PU and PU surface area. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out. Among the 12 study participants, total average monthly cost per community dwelling SCI individual with a PU was $4745. Hospital admission costs represented the greatest percentage of the total cost (62%). Sensitivity analysis showed that the total average monthly costs were most sensitive to variations in hospitalisation costs.

dermatology,surgery
The prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers among residents of long-term care institutions: a case study of Kazakhstan

Zhuldyz Zhetmekova,Laura Kassym,Assiya Kussainova,Almira Akhmetova,Irma Everink,Ainash Orazalina,Galiya Zhanaspayeva,Ainur Botabayeva,Dana Kozhakhmetova,Rauza Olzhayeva,Yuliya Semenova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57721-8

IF: 4.6

2024-03-28

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Limited information is available regarding the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PUs) in residential homes in Central Asia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the prevalence rates and risk factors associated with PUs among residents of long-term care medical institutions in the Republic of Kazakhstan. This cross-sectional study was conducted in four long-term care institutions in Kazakhstan. The study sample consisted of 640 patients who were assessed for the presence of PUs and associated risk factors. The evaluation was performed using the International Prevalence Measurement of Care Quality (Landelijke Prevalentiemeting Zorgkwaliteit, LPZ), the Braden scale, and the Care Dependency Score (CDS). The overall prevalence of PUs, classified as categories I–IV, was found to be 37%. When excluding category I PUs, the prevalence decreased to 35.6%. The odds ratios (ORs) for presenting with PUs were as follows: history of stroke (OR 5.22), diseases of the digestive system (OR 10.01), presence of spinal cord lesions/paraplegia (OR 20.50), recent reported confusion within the last 7 days (OR 184.00), and limited extent dependency according to the CDS (OR 4.44; 95%CI 1.31–16.1). It is imperative to establish specialized training programs aimed at equipping medical personnel, relatives, and patients themselves with the necessary skills to provide optimal care for individuals affected by PUs.

multidisciplinary sciences
Pressure injury prevalence and risk factors in Chinese adult intensive care units: A multi‐centre prospective point prevalence study

Frances Fengzhi Lin,Yu Liu,Zijing Wu,Jing Li,Yanming Ding,Chunyan Li,Zhixia Jiang,Jing Yang,Kefang Wang,Jie Gao,Xiaohan Li,Xinhua Xia,Hongmei Liu,Xinxia Li,Xiaoyan Chen,Lei Yang,Xiuhua Fang,Ronghua Zhao,Jingfang Chen,Sonia Labeau,Stijn Blot,the DecubICUs Study Team on behalf of the DecubICUs Study China Team,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13648

2021-07-05

International Wound Journal

Abstract:<p>Despite increasing preventive efforts, pressure injury still occurs in intensive care patients. This study was aimed to describe pressure injury prevalence, risk factors, and prevention practices in adult intensive care patients. This was a multi-centre, one-day, prospective point prevalence study in which a total of 198 intensive care units from 21 provinces in China participated. Overall and ICU-acquired prevalence in intensive care patients were 12.26% and 4.31%, respectively. Consistent with earlier reports, almost half of the ICU-acquired pressure injuries were at stage I, one-fourth were at stage 2, and the most common body sites for pressure injuries were sacral and heel region. Risk factors identified were consistent with prior studies. Repositioning was the most commonly used pressure injury prevention strategy, followed by alternating pressure mattresses/overlays, floating heels, and air-filled mattresses/overlays. These reflect a good level of adherence to recommended international pressure injury prevention clinical practice guidelines. The results provide a baseline reference for overall and ICU-acquired prevalence among adult intensive care patients in China. Future research on what contributed to the lower pressure injury incidence in China needs to be conducted to inform healthcare organisations on their future preventive strategies for pressure injury prevention.</p>

dermatology,surgery
Incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitals: 10-year cohort study

Kyu Sang Cho,Jang Hyun Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup12.S38

2021-12-01

Abstract:Objective: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a serious problem in patients with multiple comorbidities and are associated with a longer duration of hospital stay and higher medical costs. The aetiology and rate of PU occurrence in South Korea remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to determine the incidence, prevalence, mortality and common comorbidities of hospitalised patients with PUs in the South Korean healthcare system. Method: A 10-year cohort study using the healthcare insurance reimbursement claims from the South Korean National Health Insurance System database. Patients diagnosed with a PU on admission to hospital [ICD-10: L89 + procedure code] between January 2002 and December 2016 were included and their comorbidities evaluated. Patients <20 years of age and recurrent PU cases were excluded. Results: Incidence, prevalence, survival rate and risk factors related to survival rate of patients with PUs were determined. The study population in 2006 was 36,195,121 (all patients admitted to hospital that year), which changed yearly because of the inclusion of additional patients who met the study inclusion criteria, and removal of patients who had died during the year. Standardised PU incidence rate decreased from 17.1 in 2006 to 14.9 in 2015 per 10,000 people. Standardised PU prevalence also showed a slightly decreasing trend from 20.2 in 2006 to 18.9 in 2015 per 10,000 people. Conclusion: This findings of this 10-year study showed that incidence and prevalence of PUs markedly increased with age after the seventh decade. Incidence of PUs increased in patients with pneumonia, cerebral infarction, sepsis, femoral neck fracture and malignant neoplasm of the bronchus. Patients with femoral neck fracture and cerebral infarction showed a higher rate of survival than those with other high-risk comorbidities.
Pressure Ulcer Prevalence by Level of Paralysis in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury in Long-term Care

Linda J Cowan,Hyochol Ahn,Micah Flores,Joshua Yarrow,Lelia S Barks,Cyndi Garvan,Michael T Weaver,Joyce Stechmiller,Linda J. Cowan,Lelia S. Barks,Michael T. Weaver

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000553109.70752.bf

2019-10-07

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Scientific literature suggests pressure ulcer (PU) risk increases as immobility increases, indicating that more extensive paralysis confers a greater risk of PU. Yet the specific level of paralysis (ie, hemiplegia vs paraplegia vs quadriplegia ), apart from neurodegenerative diagnoses, has never been examined in the long-term care (LTC) population. This study examined the prevalence of PU among LTC residents with different paralysis levels. METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary data analysis of the 2012 US Minimum Data Set of LTC facilities (n = 51,664 residents). Measures included PU stage, level of paralysis , functional impairments, comorbidities, and sociodemographic factors. After removing residents with neurodegenerative disease, comatose patients, and those with hip fractures from the analysis, logistic regressions were used to examine the association of risk factors and sociodemographic characteristics with the presence of PU. MAIN RESULTS: The sample included 7,540 patients with quadriplegia , 11,614 patients with paraplegia , and 32,510 patients with hemiplegia in LTC facilities. The PU prevalence in the sample (stages 2, 3, and 4; suspected deep-tissue injury; and unstageable PUs) was 33.9% for patients with quadriplegia , 47.4% for patients with paraplegia , and 9.6% for patients with hemiplegia . CONCLUSIONS: Within paralysis groups (quadriplegic, paraplegic, hemiplegic), risk factors for PU differed in type and magnitude. The PU rates associated with quadriplegia and paraplegia are much higher than LTC residents without paralysis , and PU prevalence for hemiplegia is similar to the rate in LTC residents without paralysis . When the risk factor of paraplegia versus quadriplegia was isolated, PU prevalence for patients with paraplegia was significantly higher.

dermatology,nursing,surgery

Enhancement of electron-induced X-ray intensity for single particles under grazing-exit conditions

Pressure ulcers acquired during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury, characterization and predictors: A 15-years' experience

Predictors of pressure ulcer incidence following traumatic spinal cord injury: a secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal study

Pressure ulcer risk factors in persons with SCI: part I: acute and rehabilitation stages

The Prevalence, Incidence, And Associated Factors Of Pressure Injuries Among Immobile Inpatients: A Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Descriptive Study In China

Saudi Arabian adult intensive care unit pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors: a prospective cohort study

Prevalence and prediction of pressure ulcers in admitted stroke patients in a tertiary care hospital

Pressure ulcer development in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke

The Changing Prevalence of Pressure Injury among Ontarians with SCI/D at Rehabilitation Admission: Opportunities for Improvement

Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Among People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Brain metabolism after 30 minutes of hypoxic or anoxic perfusion or ischemia.

Predictors of superficial and severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries: A cross-sectional study using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ survey

Pressure Injuries and the Waterlow Subscales in the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicentre Study

Pressure Ulcers During The Covid-19 Pandemic In Intensive Care:A Multicenter Cohort Study

Incidence and Risk Factors of Pressure Injuries in Surgical Spinal Patients

Evaluation of the effectiveness of preventive nursing measures for pressure injuries in patients in the neurology intensive care unit

The average cost of pressure ulcer management in a community dwelling spinal cord injury population

The prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers among residents of long-term care institutions: a case study of Kazakhstan

Pressure injury prevalence and risk factors in Chinese adult intensive care units: A multi‐centre prospective point prevalence study

Incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitals: 10-year cohort study

Pressure Ulcer Prevalence by Level of Paralysis in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury in Long-term Care