Multiple drug resistant organisms in healthcare: the failure of contact precautions

B. Simmons,E. Larson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177415570104

2015-02-20

Journal of Infection Prevention

Abstract:Multiple drug resistant organisms (MDRO), predominantly bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents, have spread in hospitals with increasing frequency (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013a; Spellberg et al., 2008). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has noted this alarming trend and issued a ‘threat’ warning (http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threatreport-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf) for hospitals and beyond. The reasons for hospital spread are multi-factorial but the primary strategy to prevent transmission is use of hand hygiene and barriers as part of contact precautions, previously called contact isolation (Siegel et al., 2007). Virtually all MDRO are spread by contact (Sandora and Goldman, 2012). Contact can be direct, e.g. by actual touching, or indirect, by contact with objects or the environment. Contact precautions include use of single room (when possible), hand hygiene, use of dedicated equipment and supplies, and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) (gowns and gloves) for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or potentially contaminated areas of the environment (Sandora and Goldman, 2012). The aim of this paper is to suggest that contact precautions are failing, suggest why they are failing, and recommend changes to improve their effectiveness, because failure to stop the epidemic of MDRO will affect every aspect of clinical medicine, including inpatients and outpatients. Many experts recommend contact precautions for patients infected or colonised with MDRO (Muto et al., 2003; Siegel et al., 2006). Thus, active surveillance – screening of asymptomatic patients to determine colonisation – is often recommended (Huskins and O’Grady, 2011) to identify undetected reservoirs of MDRO. Colonised (or infected) patients are then placed in contact precautions, usually until screening is negative (Shenoy et al., 2013). However, use of screening and contact precautions has been shown to be ineffective for preventing transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) in ICU in a large cluster-randomised trial (Huskins et al., 2011). Even universal glove and gown use in ICU did not prevent acquisition of MRSA and VRE (Harris et al., 2013), even though gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene are the backbone of contact precautions (Siegel et al., 2007). Much like for MRSA and VRE, asymptomatic carriers of Clostridium difficile account for nearly as much crosstransmission as those who are clinically infected, suggesting that surveillance screening may have a role in preventing transmission (Curry et al., 2013). Use of surveillance screening for other MDRO clearly identifies more patients that require contact precautions than does relying only on clinical cultures (Muto et al., 2003) and therefore is likely to increase the use of contact precautions. However, not only is the evidence of effectiveness minimal, as currently practiced, contact precautions have also been associated with a number of adverse events (Stelfox et al., 2003). Given the cost of such active surveillance, the lack of proven efficacy, and the potential for adverse events, its use should be re-evaluated at least for MRSA and VRE for which active surveillance has been studied and failed (Edmond and Wenzel, 2013). Universal decolonization for MRSA with chlorhexidine bathing has proven more effective than targeted MRSA surveillance and contact precautions in the ICU (Huang et al., 2013). These studies suggest that alternative strategies to contact precautions may prevent transmission and be preferable for some MDRO, being both more effective and more acceptable (Huang et al., 2013; Milstone et al., 2013). Many studies have shown reduction of transmission of MDRO with enhanced and enforced contact precautions during epidemics. Such studies usually also include a number of Multiple drug resistant organisms in healthcare: the failure of contact precautions