Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears From Magnetic Resonance Images: Algorithm Development and Validation Study
Kun-Hui Chen,Chih-Yu Yang,Hsin-Yi Wang,Hsiao-Li Ma,Oscar Kuang-Sheng Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/37508
2022-07-26
Abstract:Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in sports and are critical knee injuries that require prompt diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a strong, noninvasive tool for detecting ACL tears, which requires training to read accurately. Clinicians with different experiences in reading MR images require different information for the diagnosis of ACL tears. Artificial intelligence (AI) image processing could be a promising approach in the diagnosis of ACL tears. Objective: This study sought to use AI to (1) diagnose ACL tears from complete MR images, (2) identify torn-ACL images from complete MR images with a diagnosis of ACL tears, and (3) differentiate intact-ACL and torn-ACL MR images from the selected MR images. Methods: The sagittal MR images of torn ACL (n=1205) and intact ACL (n=1018) from 800 cases and the complete knee MR images of 200 cases (100 torn ACL and 100 intact ACL) from patients aged 20-40 years were retrospectively collected. An AI approach using a convolutional neural network was applied to build models for the objective. The MR images of 200 independent cases (100 torn ACL and 100 intact ACL) were used as the test set for the models. The MR images of 40 randomly selected cases from the test set were used to compare the reading accuracy of ACL tears between the trained model and clinicians with different levels of experience. Results: The first model differentiated between torn-ACL, intact-ACL, and other images from complete MR images with an accuracy of 0.9946, and the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score were 0.9344, 0.9743, 0.8659, and 0.8980, respectively. The final accuracy for ACL-tear diagnosis was 0.96. The model showed a significantly higher reading accuracy than less experienced clinicians. The second model identified torn-ACL images from complete MR images with a diagnosis of ACL tear with an accuracy of 0.9943, and the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score were 0.9154, 0.9660, 0.8167, and 0.8632, respectively. The third model differentiated torn- and intact-ACL images with an accuracy of 0.9691, and the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score were 0.9827, 0.9519, 0.9632, and 0.9728, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using an AI approach to provide information to clinicians who need different information from MRI to diagnose ACL tears.