Abstract:This study addresses the need for inclusive AI education by focusing on marginalized female students who historically lack access to learning opportunities in computing. It applies the theoretical framework of intersectionality to understand how gender, race and ethnicity intersect to shape these students' learning experiences and outcomes. Specifically, this study investigated 27 high‐school students' cognitive engagement in machine learning practices. We conducted the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test to explore differences in cognitive engagement between marginalized female students and their peers, employed comparative content analysis to delve into significant differences and analysed interview data thematically to gain deeper insights into students' machine learning model development processes. The findings indicated that, when engaging in machine learning practices requiring drawing diverse cultural perspectives, marginalized female students demonstrated significantly higher performance compared to their peers. In particular, marginalized female students exhibited strengths in holistic language analysis, paying attention to writers' intentions and recognizing cultural nuances in language. This study suggests that integrating language analysis and machine learning across subjects has the potential to empower marginalized female students and amplify their perspectives. Furthermore, it calls for a strengths‐based approach to reshape the narrative of underrepresentation and promote equitable participation in machine learning and AI. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Female students, particularly those from underrepresented groups such as African American and Latina students, often experience low levels of cognitive engagement in computing. Marginalized female students possess unique strengths that, when nurtured, have the potential to not only transform their own learning experiences but also contribute to the advancement of the computing field. It is critical to empower marginalized female students in K‐12 AI (ie, a subfield of computing) education, seeking to bridge the gender and racial disparity in AI. What this paper adds Marginalized female students outperformed their peers in responding to machine learning questions related to feature analysis and feature distribution interpretation. When responding to these questions, they demonstrated a holistic approach to analysing language by considering interactions between features and writers' intentions. They drew on knowledge about how language was used to convey meaning in different cultural contexts. Implications for practice and/or policy Educators should design learning environments that encourage students to draw upon their cultural backgrounds, linguistic insights and diverse experiences to enhance their engagement and performance in AI‐related activities. Educators should strategically integrate language analysis and machine learning across different subjects to create interdisciplinary learning experiences that support students' exploration of the interplay among language, culture and AI. Educational institutions and policy initiatives should adopt a strengths‐based approach that focuses on empowering marginalized female students by acknowledging their inherent abilities and diverse backgrounds.

The criticality of language: Exploring STEM education evaluators conceptualizations of equity, diversity, and inclusion and the influence on their roles and practice

Facing and challenging language ideologies towards a more inclusive understanding of language in mathematics education research—the case of sign languages

Equity in teaching academic language—an interdisciplinary approach

Linguistic Inclusion: Challenging Implicit Classed Communication Bias in Interview Methods

A culturally responsive evaluation framework and its application in environmental education

Language, culture and identity at the nexus of professional learning

Monolingual Momentum: The Limits of Critical Language Awareness in a Hybrid Science Learning Environment

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Complicating methods for understanding educators’ language ideologies: transformative approaches for mixing methods

Diverging discourses: Examining how college students majoring in communication define diversity

Diversity and Language Technology: How Techno-Linguistic Bias Can Cause Epistemic Injustice

Critical Language Testing, Multilingualism and Social Justice

Diversity and Inclusion or Tokens? A Qualitative Study of Black Women Academic Nurse Leaders in the United States

Racial equity and inclusion in United States of America-based environmental education organizations: a critical examination of priorities and practices in the work environment

Towards inclusivity in AI: A comparative study of cognitive engagement between marginalized female students and peers

From the Horse's Mouth: the Words We Use to Teach Diverse Student Groups Across Three Continents

The multicontext path to redefining how we access and think about diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM

Critical Perspectives in Language Education Research: Exploring English-generated Inequalities from Marxist-influenced Theory

Diversity and Language Technology: How Language Modeling Bias Causes Epistemic Injustice

Revising evaluation metrics for graduate admissions and faculty advancement to dismantle privilege

Cultural competence or deficit-based view? A qualitative approach to understanding middle school students’ experience with culturally framed engineering