Revising evaluation metrics for graduate admissions and faculty advancement to dismantle privilege

Andres De Los Reyes,Lucina Q. Uddin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00836-2
IF: 25
2021-03-30
Nature Neuroscience
Abstract:Academics are not immune to the biases contributing to persistent inequalities in society. We face an urgent need to overhaul and dismantle current evaluation practices that uphold inequities at multiple points along the academic pipeline. Graduate admissions and faculty advancement are two arenas of gatekeeping in which a reimagining and redistribution of weighting of commonly used evaluation metrics are warranted. We define and promote the use of dynamic, flexible holistic evaluation models that can be implemented by first recognizing and acknowledging the biases that contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in academia. Leaders of academic institutions must step up to drive adoption of these revised evaluation metrics.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?