Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation Nasal Mask Interface Pressure and the Inter-Individual Variation of Mask Placement

Anne D Zakrajsek,Lissy Kesterson,Marty O Visscher,Vivek Narendran,Orlando S Hoilett,Eric A Nauman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12217
2024-10-08
Abstract:Background: The 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for CPAP as an alternative to mechanical ventilation for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress prompted a rapid shift to noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Since most patients receive nasal bubble CPAP (a form of NIV), a concomitant increase in nasal pressure injuries followed. This prospective observational study aims to develop strategies to reduce nasal mask pressure injury in neonates by 1.) quantifying CPAP mask-interface pressure and 2.) assessing placement variability. Methods: A 1F MEMS Connect pressure sensor (Millar®) was modified for contact pressure measurements with silicone embedding and calibrated. The CPAP generator and interface components were sized for a 24-week neonatal simulator. Thirteen neonatal ICU staff placed the simulator on CPAP at 6 cmH2O and 8 L/min of flow with no humidification. Pressure was measured at three locations (the forehead, nasal bridge, and philtrum) in triplicate (three measurements per site). Descriptive statistics, a location-specific, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey post hoc test, and a two-sample paired t-test of the means of the first and last triplicate were performed (Minitab, LLC). Results: Pressure ranged from 12.3 to 377.3 mmHg. The mean (SD) interface pressure at the philtrum was significantly higher than both the nasal bridge and the forehead (philtrum: 173.9 (101.3), nasal bridge: 67.79 (28.9), and forehead 79.02 (36.87), p ˂ 0.001). CPAP fixation varied, including bonnet placement, trunk angle, mask compression, use of hook and loop extenders, and level of vigorous bubble feedback achieved. Conclusions: This study developed a modified pressure sensor for quantifying the pressure exerted by a nasal mask on facial skin. Maximum pressures were higher than those previously reported. Inter-individual differences were present in both quantitative and qualitative measures of pressure. Reduction of NIV-associated pressure injuries may be achieved through NIV fixation technique training and improved nasal mask stability and size increments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?