Abstract:Background Mechanical force skin injuries are common for critical care patients, especially neonates. Currently, identification and severity assessments of injuries are dependent on clinical experience and/or utilization of severity tools. Compared with adults, neonates sustain skin injuries in different anatomical locations and have decreased layers of healthy tissue (from 0.9 to 1.2 mm) creating questions around direct application of adult injury severity scales reliant on visual assessment. Aims The aim of this scoping review (ScR) was to investigate severity scales used to report hospital acquired skin injuries for neonates. Methods This study utilized the 2015 Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses for Scoping Reviews extension. PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE Central, Scopus, and the reference lists of included studies were searched for studies published between 2001 and 2023, that included severity scales use within neonatal population. Two authors independently identified studies for full review, data extraction, and quality assessment. Results A systematic database search returned 1163 records. After full test review of 109 studies, 35 studies were included. A majority of studies included were cohort or action research and conducted in the United States of America. Most studies (57%, n = 20) reported skin injuries acquired throughout the body, 14 (40%) of the studies reported the nasal area alone and one study reported no anatomical location. A total of nine severity scales or combination of scales were utilized within studies (n = 31) and four studies did not report a scale. Various versions of scales from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (n = 16), European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (n = 8) or Neonatal Skin Condition Score (n = 4) were reported, compared with locally developed classifications/scales (n = 4). Scales were predominantly of ordinal grouping (74%, n = 26) or categorical assessment (14%, n = 5). Only one scale from 2004 was validated for neonates. Conclusion Neonatal skin injuries will continue to be reported subjectively until severity scales are consistently applied or other measurements are identified to support assessment. Additionally, without skin injury assessment uniformity, critical examination of effectiveness of skin care treatment practices will have subjective comparison. This review suggests there is a need for consistent skin assessment and severity scales that are valid for the neonatal population and their unique skin considerations.

TOPIRAMATE AND THE RISK OF UROLITHIASIS

Strong interaction of rare gas clusters with high-intensity laser pulses

A scoping review and narrative synthesis of neonatal skin injury severity scales

Prevention of face pressure injuries associated with non-invasive ventilation: scoping review

Non-invasive Ventilation Interventions for Skin Injury Prevention: Scoping Review

Effect of different noninvasive ventilation interfaces on the prevention of facial pressure injury: A network meta -analysis

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Brief Training for Neonatal Intensive Care Nurses on the Prevention of Medical Device-Related Nasal Pressure Injury

Mask‐related pressure injury prevention associated with non‐invasive ventilation: A systematic review

Quality improvement for reducing nasal continuous positive airway pressure related nasal injury in neonatal intensive care unit

State of the art on neonatal noninvasive respiratory support: How physiological and technological principles explain the clinical outcomes

Predictors of NIV-related adverse events in children using long-term noninvasive ventilation

Sustained Reduction of Nasal Pressure Injuries in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit With the Use of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Quality Improvement Project

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in neonatal and pediatric critical care—A scoping review of randomized controlled trials

Critical Breaths in Transit: A Review of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) for Neonatal and Pediatric Patients During Transportation

Complex spatial organization and flagellin composition of flagellar propeller from marine magnetotactic ovoid strain MO-1.

Nonsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure as a primary mode of respiratory support in neonates (26−40 weeks) admitted in a tertiary care center: A randomized controlled trial

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Application of a photoelectric magnifier to nasal injury in preterm infants receiving non-invasive ventilation: A prospective observational study

Noninvasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous or Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Assessment of Nurses' knowledge about Neonatal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Nasal Injuries at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit