Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is a growing PD modality but as with other home dialysis methods, the lack of monitoring of patients' adherence to prescriptions is a limitation with potential negative impact on clinical outcome parameters. Remote patient monitoring (RPM-PD) allowing the clinical team to have access to dialysis data and adjust the treatment may overcome this limitation. As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the importance of RPM programs has raised to allow the physicians ensure optimal care of PD patients. In addition, to avoid the increased risk of complications or technique failure, the present study sought to determine clinical outcomes associated with RPM use in patients on APD therapy. METHOD We performed a systematic review in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases to select studies that met the inclusion criteria. The search terms used were: peritoneal dialysis, remote monitoring, sharesource, outcomes, peritonitis, hospitalization, technique failure and adherence. These search terms were individually used and then combined in different databases. References within the chosen studies were reviewed. We followed the recommendations of Cochrane collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses guidelines. STATA package-15 was used. We combined all study-specific estimates using inverse-variant weighted averages of logarithmic relative risk in random effects model. Confidence interval including the value of 1 was used evident for statistically significant estimate. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Higgins I2 statistic. Heterogeneity was estimated when the level of P-value was < 0.1. Results of the random effects model were spread out on the forest plot graph. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included in our meta-analysis. In qualitative analysis: five studies showed that RPM in APD patients had lower hospitalization rates compared to traditional PD. Five studies showed better adherence in the RPM-PD group. Five studies showed better outcomes among RPM-APD patients in terms of symptom control, management of fluid balance, blood pressure control, dialysis prescription and electrolyte management. Five studies showed that RPM-APD had better outcomes in terms of patient independence, quality of life, patient and caregiver satisfaction. Five studies showed better cost-effectiveness in RPM-PD compared to traditional PD. Four studies showed better cost-effectiveness in RMP-PD. Three studies showed lower technique failure rates in RPM-PD compared to traditional PD. Three studies showed lower mortality rates in RPM-PD compared to traditional PD. Three studies showed better quality of life and patient satisfaction in RPM-PD. In quantitative analysis, RPM-PD patients had lower rates of technique failure (log relative risk = −0.32, 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.04), lower hospitalization rates (SMD = −0.84, 95% CI: −1.24 to −0.45), lower mortality rates (log RR = −0.26, 95% CI: −0.44 to −0.08) in comparison to traditional PD. CONCLUSION RPM-PD has better outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness, patient adherence, hospital admissions, rate of peritonitis, technique failure, mortality rates, symptom control, quality of life, patient and caregiver satisfaction.

Utilization of Remote Patient Monitoring for Neurological Disorders: A Nationwide Analysis of Administrative Claims Data

Associations Between Sociodemographic Factors And Interest in Remote Patient Monitoring Among Arkansas Residents

National Patterns of Remote Patient Monitoring Service Availability at US Hospitals and their Readmission Performance for Cardiovascular Conditions

Factors Associated with Remote Patient Monitoring Services Provision by Hospitals and Health Care Systems in the United States

Remote Patient Monitoring at Home in Patients With COVID-19: Narrative Review

0489 Two Years Of Experience Managing OSA Patients Using Remote Patient Monitoring

Hospital Admission Rates and Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients with COVID-19 Discharged with Remote Patient Monitoring with or without HO2ME - A Value-Based Approach

Remote Patient Monitoring Effectively Assures Continuity of Care in Asthma Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Escalation Pathways of Remote Patient Monitoring Programs for COVID-19 Patients in Canada and the United States: A Rapid Review

Promoting digital health equity through remote patient monitoring: A feasibility study.

Differences in perceptions and use of remote patient monitoring technology in rural cancer programs.

Incorporating remote patient monitoring in virtual pulmonary rehabilitation programs

Remote Patient Monitoring and Machine Learning in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Dual Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis

Abstract MP11: Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring Hypertension Program with Telehealth Pharmacist Management in Nephrology Clinic Patients

A systematic review of the impacts of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions on safety, adherence, quality-of-life and cost-related outcomes

Integration of Remote Patient Monitoring Systems into Physicians Work in Underserved Communities: Survey of Healthcare Provider Perspectives

Challenges and Facilitators in Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring Programs in Primary Care

MO700: Outcomes of Remote Patient Monitoring among Peritoneal Dialysis Population in the Covid-19 ERA

Telehealth Use and Access to Neurology Outpatient Clinical Services for Children: An Observational Cohort Study

Remote Real Time Digital Monitoring fills a Critical Gap in the Management of Parkinson's disease

Patient Experience in a Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hypertension: A Qualitative Study