Abstract:The 2023 joint American Heart Association and American Medical Association statement highlighted the proven impact of remote patient monitoring (RPM) on blood pressure (BP) control and underscored the need for widespread implementation of RPM in practice-based settings. 1 The article by Mehta et al 2 sought to fill this implementation gap by conducting a 3-arm randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of RPM of BP and medication adherence reminders, RPM of BP and medication adherence reminders with feedback to a social support partner, and usual care on reduction of systolic BP at 4 months (primary outcome). The trial included 246 adults with uncontrolled hypertension at baseline. Participants in both the RPM alone and RPM plus support person groups received a free home BP monitor, 3 text message reminders per week to take and submit their BP readings, and 1 text message to assess their medication adherence over the past week. Patients in both arms also received weekly feedback on their BP and adherence data. Support partners who opted in to the study also received weekly feedback, which was used to send the partnered patient a weekly motivational message tailored to their BP and adherence data. The intervention arms also included a summary of the BP values and recommendations for medication adjustments sent to the primary care physician (PCP) via the electronic health record (EHR) to prompt medication titrations if 3 of the 10 BP readings were elevated based on Eighth Joint National Committee guidelines. For the cohort enrolled in 2018 (151 participants), the PCP-facing intervention components were sent to the PCP directly. For the second cohort in 2019 (100 participants), the PCP-facing intervention was redesigned to send the EHR messages to a centralized nurse who then routed medication changes to the PCPs. Patients randomized to the control arm received standard care. Overall, the investigators found no significant differences between the intervention and control groups for any of the BP outcomes. These negative findings need to be evaluated within the context in which the intervention was delivered and the choices made for the intervention content. Before discussing the limitations, it is important to point out some of the study's strengths. First, it was conducted at an urban primary care clinic and included mainly female and Black participants. Second, the provision of a free BP monitor, the use of text messages as a ubiquitous digital platform with high reach, and the inclusion of a support partner all help to address the digital determinants of health that limit health disparity populations' engagement with digital health interventions. 3 Finally, the intervention was well-received and highly recommended to others who may need it. Outside of these strengths, the study had several major shortcomings related to the implementation context and intervention choices that could explain the null results. First, regarding the implementation context, this study was conducted prior to the rapid expansion of RPM technologies to support virtual health care delivery, partly driven by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. In the first phase, the investigators relied on PCPs to review, interpret, and integrate the self-measured BP values into their treatment decisions. It is not surprising that PCPs had a low uptake of RPM. For PCPs, managing RPM data requires added work outside of routine clinical encounters (ie, new workflow) or added burden during clinical encounters, which disrupts their routine workflow. Task shifting, involved in reviewing RPM data through faxed paperwork, clicking on various parts of the EHR, or logging on to a third-party technology platform, is known to add cognitive burden and contribute to clinician burnout. While the study included social norm nudges to prompt PCP medication adjustments, the context matters here as well. Although social norm messaging has been shown to influence behavior, effects may have been minimized in this trial due to the larger context in which clinicians are now overburdened by reminders and messages. For this reason, we and others have shown that team-based care models that delegate RPM implementation to nonphysician practitioners, such as nurses or clinical pharmacists, is essential to effective clinical integration of RPM. 4 In the second phase, the investigators used a nurse-led model to implement the RPM program, but it did not improve the success of the intervention. This lack of improvement is difficult to explain without additional data. For example, how well were the RPM workflows integrated into the centralized nurse workflow? What were the incentives at the individual and system level for active management, and how well did these additional RPM workflows align with established care responsibilities? These operational factors need to be carefully measured wh -Abstract Truncated-

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the effect of remote blood pressure monitoring (Remote Patient Monitoring, RPM) in the actual clinical environment, especially for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Specifically, through a three - arm randomized clinical trial, the study compared the effectiveness of three interventions in reducing systolic blood pressure (systolic BP): 1. **Using RPM only**: Participants will receive a home blood pressure monitor, and be reminded by text message to measure and submit blood pressure data three times a week, and at the same time, drug compliance will be evaluated once a week. 2. **RPM plus social support partner feedback**: In addition to the above measures, the participants' social support partners will also receive feedback weekly, and these feedbacks are used to send customized motivational messages to the participants. 3. **Routine care**: As a control group, these participants receive standard care. The main outcome measure is the reduction of systolic blood pressure after 4 months. The researchers hope to fill the gap in the implementation of RPM in the actual clinical environment through this trial, especially considering the positive impact of RPM on blood pressure control and the necessity of its wide implementation emphasized in the joint statement of the American Heart Association and the American Medical Association. However, the study finally found that there were no significant differences in any blood pressure results between the intervention group and the control group. These negative results need to be evaluated in the specific context of the implementation of the intervention and the selection of the intervention content.

Navigating Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring

Patient Experience in a Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hypertension: A Qualitative Study

Abstract MP11: Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring Hypertension Program with Telehealth Pharmacist Management in Nephrology Clinic Patients

Abstract P009: Feasibility And Acceptability Of A Digitally-Based Blood Pressure Self-monitoring Program That Promotes Hypertension Self-management And Health Education Among Low-income Patients.

A Pilot Project to Implement a Pharmacist-Managed Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Service

Blood pressure outcomes at 18 months in primary care patients prescribed remote physiological monitoring for hypertension: a prospective cohort study

Promoting digital health equity through remote patient monitoring: A feasibility study.

A Clinician and Electronic Health Record Wearable Device Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Patients With Obesity: Formative Qualitative Study

A Remote Patient Monitoring System with Feedback Mechanisms using a Smartwatch: Concept, Implementation and Evaluation based on the activeDCM Randomized Controlled Trial

Engagement in mHealth-Prompted Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Participants Recruited From a Safety-Net Emergency Department: Secondary Analysis of the Reach Out Trial

Remote Patient Monitoring Effectively Assures Continuity of Care in Asthma Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Feasibility of a blood pressure telemedicine program in the virtual age

Integration of Remote Patient Monitoring Systems into Physicians Work in Underserved Communities: Survey of Healthcare Provider Perspectives

Evaluation of self-measured blood pressure monitoring in a southern rural West Virginia health system

Adoption of self‐measured blood pressure monitoring in underserved communities: Program evaluation in primary care

P044 TEAM-BASED CARE TO MANAGE COMPLEX CASES OF HYPERTENSION

Patient Engagement With and Perspectives on a Mobile Health Home Spirometry Intervention: Mixed Methods Study

Differences in perceptions and use of remote patient monitoring technology in rural cancer programs.

Patient reported experience and adherence to remote patient management in chronic heart failure patients: a posthoc analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial

Self-Measured Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Programs: A Pragmatic How-to Guide

The Clinical Impact and Good Practices of Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Heart Failure: A French Case Report