How Other Specialists See Palliative Care Uncovering Their Deep Metaphors to Improve Our Initial Outreach Strategies

Anthony L Back,Sanaya S Shikari,MaryGrace S King,Kathy C Shaw,Marian S Grant,Lindsay Zaltman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0248
2024-10-07
Abstract:Many patients who could benefit from palliative care (PC) do not access it because of the timing and tenor of the introduction provided by their specialist. A barrier to improving specialists' (from disciplines other than PC) engagement with PC services may be an inadequate understanding of how those specialists view PC. As part of a larger project to develop public messaging for advance care planning, PC, and hospice, we conducted a qualitative market research study aimed at identifying the "deep metaphors" held by specialists about PC to provide an empirical foundation for more effective outreach and messaging. To identify deep metaphors, we used the qualitative Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique to uncover thought patterns from participants' images and interview responses, revealing deeper emotional meanings and unconscious mental orientations. We enrolled 20 provider-level clinicians from a variety of professional disciplines and specialties to participate in a one-hour semi-structured interview that required prework. The interviews were videorecorded and transcribed and were analyzed along with images brought by participants using a variation of the constant comparative method. The themes included: Having to tell patients the "right" information and path; Not allowing myself to make mistakes; Depending on algorithms so I can give my patients the best care; Putting the patient in charge can challenge clinical algorithms; Observing that PC seems to lack an objectively "right" decision; Consulting PC invites subjectivity best contained at the end of the algorithm. These themes can inform strategies for outreach and messaging to other serious illness specialist clinicians to lower reluctance to consult PC, increasing patient access.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?