Abstract:e18720 Background: Virginia Cancer Institute (VCI) participated in the Oncology Care Model (OCM) with an aim to improve cancer care quality. As part of OCM, VCI started a palliative care program (PC) in 2016 by partnering with a local palliative care provider. In September 2020, VCI overhauled PC moving away from outside provider (OPC) and created an internal program (IPC). Both programs managed care from VCI oncologist referrals to PC until patient’s hospice start or practice discharge. This study describes the methods or changes from OPC to IPC and the resulting difference in hospice quality measure performance. Methods: Under OPC, services were provided half-day per week in office from a PC nurse practitioner (NP). IPC changed to a PC NP employed by VCI who provided services 5 days per week with office, hospital and telemedicine options. IPC added multiple PC education, communication touchpoints with oncologists and practice staff. IPC provided reminders to VCI physician teams about the availability of in-house PC services and the benefits of early engagement. Along with the oncologists, IPC continued goals of care discussions with patients and family to ensure patients’ desires and needs were met. OPC hospice referrals from PC went to a single hospice group. IPC added a network of multiple hospice groups. Retrospective claims review of OCM performance periods (PP) 1-8 (Jul 2016 – Dec 2020) for OPC and OCM PP 9-10 (Jul 2020 – Dec 2021) for IPC was performed and excluded patients with incomplete hospice claims. Primary endpoint was difference between OPC and IPC in OCM-3 quality: proportion of OCM patients who died during their episode with 3 or more days hospice immediately prior to death. Secondary endpoint was the difference in proportions of OPC and IPC with any hospice length of stay. Z-test between 2 proportions was used to calculate significance. Results: There were 871 and 197 OCM-3 eligible patients reviewed from OPC and IPC respectively. OCM-3 quality performance was 48.1% OPC and 62.4% IPC, p < 0.01. Any hospice performance was 65.8% OPC and 78.7% IPC, p < 0.01. The OCM-3 goal throughout for maximum quality score was 60%. Performance improvement started in the first IPC period (PP9) and was greater in the second IPC period (PP10). Conclusions: Results showed a significant improvement in OCM performance measures between OPC and IPC over a short period of 10 months. After IPC, practice met the OCM-3 goal. The data is limited to latest available OCM reconciliation claims and may be refreshed when additional OCM data is released. Although specific cause and effect was not assessed, the authors attribute quality improvement to the implementation of an internal, full-time PC NP. This expanded PC access for patients and increased communication between patients and providers. We believe that, as a result, the quality of care delivery improved.

Embedding palliative care (pc) in a community-based cancer center: Benefits and barriers.

Implementation of a Novel Pathway to Integrate Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Community Hospital

Care Coordination Between Family Physicians and Palliative Care Physicians for Patients With Cancer: Results of a Quality Improvement Initiative

Too Many Appointments: Assessing Provider and Nursing Perception of Barriers to Referral for Outpatient Palliative Care

A qualitative study of providers' perspectives on cross-institutional care coordination for pancreatic cancer: challenges and opportunities

BE-A-PAL: Behavioral economics and automated analytics to improve palliative care among patients with advanced cancer.

Impact of an Embedded Palliative Care Clinic on Healthcare Utilization for Patients With a New Thoracic Malignancy

Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program: A model for meeting an unmet need for patients with PC.

The impact on hospice quality after initiation of an internal palliative care program by a community oncology practice.

The ESCAPADE Study: Early supportive care for advanced cancer patients, assessing care delivery and provider engagement.

Interdisciplinary care rounds in the community: Changing the paradigm of supportive service involvement in cancer care.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Implement Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment and Care Plans

Prevalence, Trend and Disparities of Palliative Care Utilization among Hospitalized Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Critical Care Therapies

Introducing palliative care in advanced cancer: a systematic review

Moving beyond "Better Late than Never": High Symptom Burden and Diminished Functional Status at First Palliative Care Visit for Patients with Gynecological Cancers

Palliative Care as a Component of High-Value and Cost-Saving Care During Hospitalization for Metastatic Cancer

A Scoping Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Engagement in Hospital-Based Palliative Care in Australian Hospitals

The Sowers of Seeds: A Qualitative Analysis of the Role of Palliative Care Educators in Facilitating Goals-of-Care Conversations and Palliative Care Referrals

Acute palliative care in the assessment areas

Exploring patient awareness of palliative care - optimal timing and preferred approaches