Abstract:Background: The underuse of invasive fraction flow reserve (FFR) in clinical practice has motivated research towards its non-invasive prediction. The early attempts relied on solving the incompressible three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations in segmented coronary arteries. However, transient boundary condition has a high resource intensity in terms of computational time. Herein, a method for calculating FFR based on steady-state geometric multiscale (FFR SS ) is proposed. Methods: A total of 154 moderately stenotic vessels (40–80% diameter stenosis) from 136 patients with stable angina were included in this study to validate the clinical diagnostic performance of FFR SS . The method was based on the coronary artery model segmented from the patient’s coronary CTA image. The average pressure was used as the boundary condition for the inlet, and the microcirculation resistance calculated by the coronary flow was used as the boundary condition for the outlet to calculate the patient-specific coronary hyperemia. Then, the flow velocity and pressure distribution and the FFRss of each coronary artery branch were calculated to evaluate the degree of myocardial ischemia caused by coronary stenosis. Also, the FFR SS and FFR CT of all patients were calculated, and the clinically measured FFR was used as the “gold standard” to verify the diagnostic performance of FFR SS and to compare the correlation between FFR SS and FFR CT . Results: According to the FFR SS calculation results of all patients, FFR SS and FFR have a good correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). Similarly, the correlation of FFR SS and FFR CT demonstrated an r of 0.75 (95%CI: 0.67–0.72) ( p < 0.001). On receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the optimal FFR SS cut point for FFR≤0.80 was 0.80 (AUC:0.85 [95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 0.90]; overall accuracy:88.3%). The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for FFR SS ≤0.80 versus FFR ≤0.80 was 68.18% (95% CI: 52.4–81.4), 93.64% (95% CI: 87.3–97.4), 82.9%, and 91.1%, respectively. Conclusion: FFR SS is a reliable diagnostic index for myocardial ischemia. This method was similar to the closed-loop geometric multiscale calculation of FFR accuracy but improved the calculation efficiency. It also improved the clinical applicability of the non-invasive computational FFR model, helped the clinicians diagnose myocardial ischemia, and guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Prediction of fractional flow reserve using intravascular ultrasound

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Fractional flow reserve for coronary stenosis assessment derived from fusion of intravascular ultrasound and X-ray angiography.

Accuracy of Intravascular Ultrasound-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Identifying Hemodynamic Significance of Coronary Stenosis

Non-Invasive Quantification of Fraction Flow Reserve Based on Steady-State Geometric Multiscale Models

Diagnostic Performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd)-Based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) for Assessing Functional Severity of Coronary Lesions

Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound for PCI.

A Novel Method of Noninvasive Quantification of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

Comprehensive Assessment Of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve

Diagnostic Performance of AccuFFRangio in the Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Compared with Pressure Wire-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Coronary fractional flow reserve derived from intravascular ultrasound imaging: Validation of a new computational method of fusion between anatomy and physiology

Image-based assessment of fractional flow reserve.

Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from reduced-order coronary model and machine learning prediction of stenosis flow resistance

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis

Machine-learning-based Prediction of Fractional Flow Reserve after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity.

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis

Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.