Strain Patterns With Ultrasound for Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Vessel Wall Biomechanics

Ulver S Lorenzen,Marta I Bracco,Alexander H Zielinski,Magdalena Broda,Stéphane Avril,Laurence Rouet,Jonas P Eiberg,COACH Research Collaborative
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.014
Abstract:Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%-10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility. Methods: In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics. Results: Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern "topography" (i.e., curve phases or "peaks" and "valleys") had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029-0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's ρ = 0.02, false discovery rate-p = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg). Discussion: Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?