Deep infections after low-velocity ballistic tibia fractures are frequently polymicrobial and recalcitrant

Nainisha Chintalapudi,Brianna R Fram,Susan Odum,Rachel B Seymour,Madhav A Karunakar,EMIT,Joseph R Hsu,Laurence Kempton,Kevin Phelps,Stephen Sims,Suman Medda,Juliette Sweeney,Kate Hickson,Catherine Young,Priyanka Kamath
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000345
2024-10-01
Abstract:Objectives: To identify risk factors for developing a fracture-related infection in operatively treated ballistic tibia fractures and to report the microbiologic results of intraoperative cultures. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients/participants: One hundred thirty-three adults with operatively treated low-velocity ballistic tibia fractures, from 2011 to 2021. Intervention: One dose of prophylactic cefazolin or equivalent as well as perioperative prophylaxis. Main outcome measurements: Deep infection rate. Results: The deep infection rate was 12% (16/134) with no significant difference in injury characteristics, index surgical characteristics, or time to antibiotics between the groups (P > 0.05). Patients who were slightly older (35.5 vs. 27 median years, P = 0.005) and with higher median body mass indexes (BMIs) (30.09 vs. 24.51, P = 0.021) developed a deep infection. 56.3% of patients presented with signs of infection within the first 100 days after injury. Nine patients had polymicrobial infections. There were 29 isolated organisms, 69% were uncovered by first-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis (anaerobes, gram-negative rods, Enterococcus, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus [MRSA]), and 50% of patients developed recalcitrant infection and required a second reoperation where 6 organisms were isolated, half of which were not covered by first-generation prophylaxis (Enterococcus, Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA). Conclusions: We found a deep infection rate of 12% among ballistic tibia fractures receiving standard-of-care antibiotic prophylaxis. Increased age and body mass index were associated with deep infections. Half became recalcitrant requiring a second reoperation. 66.7% of isolated organisms were not covered by first-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis. Consideration should be given to treatment options such as broader prophylaxis or local antibiotic treatment. Level of evidence: IV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?