Characteristics of a Large Database of Healthy Eyes From Optometry Practices: Implications for a Real-World Reference Database

Donald C Hood,Mary Durbin,Sol La Bruna,Chris Lee,Yi Sing Hsiao,Nevin W El-Nimri,Carlos Gustavo De Moraes,Emmanouil Tsamis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.10.8
2024-10-01
Abstract:Purpose: To compare an optical coherence tomography (OCT) real-world reference database (RW-RDB) of "healthy" eyes obtained from optometry practices to a commercial reference database (RDB). Methods: OCT scans from 6804 individuals 18 years and older were sampled from a larger database tested at 10 optometry practices involved in refractive and screening services. Employing a reading center method, OCT scans from both eyes of 4932 (4.9K) individuals were judged to be of acceptable quality with an absence of pathology. The 4.9K RW-RDB was compared to a commercial RDB with 398 eyes (398 RDB). Results: The means and distributions of global circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (G-cpRNFL) and global ganglion cell layer (G-GCL) thickness, as well as five key anatomical parameters affecting cpRNFL thickness, were not significantly different for all but one parameter (fovea-to-disc distance) and one thickness metric (G-cpRNFL). In both cases, the difference amounted to less than 1.5%. By design, the number of 4.9K RW-RDB eyes 70 years and older (724, 14.7%) was greater than for the 398 RDB (40, 10.1%). The error bands on the 5% and 1% quantile regression lines (QRLs) were substantially narrower for the 4.9K RW-RDB. Conclusions: The 398 RDB and 4.9K RW-RDB have similar characteristics and appear to come from a similar population. However, the large size of the 4.9K RW-RDB leads to narrower error bands of the QRLs, which has the potential to increase accuracy. Translational relevance: The larger RW-RDB offers the opportunity to better characterize healthy eyes for clinical diagnosis and clinical trials by furthering our understanding of the patterns of artifacts, exploring covariates, developing separate RW-RDBs, and/or improving AI models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?