Leadership Development and Its Association With Retention of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Faculty at a Large Academic Health Center

David P Way,Leena Nahata,Cynthia Gerhardt,Daniel R Martin,Ricardo L Carrau,Bhagwan Satiani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.011
Abstract:Introduction: Leadership development programs are the key for engaging physicians as partners in health-care administration. These programs have become common; however, one potential consequence of leadership training is attrition. Methods: Using a prospectively collected database, Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze attrition of physician faculty following an intramural leadership program at an academic health center. Results: Six cohorts totaling 165 faculty successfully completed our leadership program. Sixty-one faculty (37%) were from surgical departments (Group A) and 104 (63%) from nonsurgical departments (Group B). Thirty-six program graduates (21.8%) departed the institution at a mean follow-up of 68 mo for an annualized attrition rate of 3.6%. Attrition rates for Group B were significantly greater than for Group A (P = 0.05). Most faculty left for career advancement opportunities elsewhere. Conclusions: Our annualized attrition rate for leadership trained faculty was 3.6%, well below the attrition rate of our academic health center (5.3%) over a similar time period, and the 2018 national physician attrition rate of 7.8%. Strategies to improve retention are discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?