How a Large Academic Training Program Influences Early Career Decision-making and Employment Stability in Urology

Jackson J Cabo,Jacob E Tallman,George E Koch,Kristen R Scarpato,Sam S Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.002
IF: 2.633
Urology
Abstract:Objective: To characterize training and practice factors that influence early career stability and satisfaction in urology residency and fellowship graduates. Methods: A computer-based survey was distributed to residency and fellowship graduates from a single, large US training program from 1992 to 2015. Queries encompassed training program specifics, post-training practice characteristics, and a validated burnout assessment. Results: Of 108 surveyed individuals there were 77 (71.3%) respondents. Fifty-one (67.1%) remained in their first position after residency. While 52 (67.5%) urologists reported that the program did not formally assist in finding their first post-residency position, no respondent reported difficulty securing a position. Proximity to family was a major factor in selecting a post-residency position in 40 (51.9%) of respondents. Twenty-nine (37.7%) participants joined practices with at least one other graduate of the same urology training program on staff and 24 remain in this position (82%). Conclusion: Urology graduates from a large US training program did not have difficulty finding employment after training and most remain in their first post-training position. While proximity to family was a strong consideration for graduates, the perceived importance of first-position characteristics varied widely. 37.7% of our cohort took initial positions at a practice already employing a graduate from the same training program with >80% staying in this position. Surveying a broader range of programs may help future graduates and training programs better tailor their mentorship curricula and alumni networks to trainee goals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?