Abstract:Chest radiography (CXR) for the diagnosis of pulmonary complications offers portability and wide accessibility and is inexpensive. CXR is often the first imaging modality for the detection of lung disease and, thus, shapes disease management strategy (1). Despite the significance and obvious advantages, the inconsistent interpretation of CXR and associated reporting delays continue to be a significant burden in various healthcare settings (2–5). Alternatively, recent advances in convolutional neural networks have led to the birth of several stand-alone artificial intelligence (AI) tools to interpret CXR. Several studies have evaluated the impact of AI as an assistant to the workflow of radiologists in the detection and localization of key radiographic findings and in clinical decision making (6, 7). There is an augmented curiosity but a cautious adoption of AI-based diagnostics by radiologists (8). AI algorithms have been developed and deployed for specific CXR diagnostic tasks, such as detection of lung nodules (7), emphysema (9), pneumonia (10), and pneumothorax (11), which have exhibited radiologist-level performance and accuracy. Even though AI applications in CXR diagnosis have been shown to aid radiologists in detection of key radiographic findings, the benefit of AI-assisted CXR diagnosis and interpretation by nonradiologist physicians has not been well examined. Furthermore, it is unclear how deep learning and AI-based applications will integrate into a nonradiologist’s clinical workflow and what impact they will have on their efficiency. In this issue ofAnnalsATS, Lee and colleagues (pp. 660–667) designed a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate the impact of AI assistance on the detection and localization of lung lesions on CXR by nonradiologist physicians (12). The CXRs were randomized into an intervention group of 162 patients, in which CXR interpretation was aided by AI, and a control group of 161 patients, in which CXR interpretation was performed by nonradiologist physicians without the aid of AI. The accuracy of the AI algorithm was verified by three expert radiologists. In diagnosing the presence of lesions, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.90) for the intervention group, compared with 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64–0.79) for the control group (P value=0.017). The intervention was associated with significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive value. In localizing lesions on CXR, the results followed a similar pattern, with an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74–0.86) for physicians with AI assistance and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60–0.75) in the control group (P=0.01). The study also reported between-group comparisons of the diagnostic accuracy when aided by chest computed tomography (CT) findings instead of AI. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between the intervention and the control groups in detecting lung lesions. At regional localization of lesions based on chest CT findings, the intervention group had a significantly higher area under the precisionrecall curve of 0.86, versus 0.69 in the control group (P=0.009). The study also included the effect of AI assistance on physicians’ clinical decisions as a secondary endpoint. There were no significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in the follow-up recommendations of clinical procedures, including chest CT, bronchoscopy, biopsy, and surgery. This is a carefully constructed and much-needed study measuring the impact of AI assistance on nonradiologist physicians from several outpatient clinics. The real clinical benefits of any AI-based diagnostic platform should include higher diagnostic accuracy with improved reporting efficiency, resulting in reduced false-positive and false-negative rates. AI-aided radiologic interpretation of lung lesions provided a significant advantage for physicians in the detection and localization of lung lesions and decreased the false referral rate. The control group without AI assistance had a higher frequency of followup chest CT scans than the intervention group. We should, however, note certain limitations. Although AI helped in imagebased detection and localization, it is critical to note that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of follow-up clinical decisions. This may depend on the population selected and frequency of clinical decision making using CXR. The authors missed an opportunity by not evaluating the time saved and improvements to clinical workflows in the AI-assisted physicians group. Although AI results were verified by three expert radiologists, there is less clarity on the

Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-enabled diagnostic assistance device in recognizing normal chest radiographs: a service evaluation

Real-World evaluation of an AI triaging system for chest X-rays: A prospective clinical study

Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Chest Radiographs Referred from the Emergency Department

Implementation of Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Chest X-ray Interpretation: It Is About Time

A real-world evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists using positive predictive values verified from deep learning and natural language processing chest algorithms deployed retrospectively

Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably Report Chest X-Rays?: Radiologist Validation of an Algorithm trained on 2.3 Million X-Rays

Large-Scale Study on AI's Impact on Identifying Chest Radiographs with No Actionable Disease in Outpatient Imaging

Evaluation of the Performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Algorithm in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on Chest Radiographs

Using artificial intelligence to detect chest X-rays with no significant findings in a primary health care setting in Oulu, Finland

Evaluating the performance of artificial intelligence software for lung nodule detection on chest radiographs in a retrospective real-world UK population

Nonradiology Health Care Professionals Significantly Benefit From AI Assistance in Emergency-Related Chest Radiography Interpretation

Navigating the Spectrum: Assessing the Concordance of ML-Based AI Findings with Radiology in Chest X-Rays in Clinical Settings

Real-world testing of an artificial intelligence algorithm for the analysis of chest X-rays in primary care settings

Diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available deep-learning algorithm in supine chest radiographs following trauma

Integration and evaluation of chest X-ray artificial intelligence in clinical practice

Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Second Reader on the Lung Nodule Detection and Localization Accuracy of Radiologists and Non-radiology Physicians in Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter Reader Study

Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Platform Against Clinical Radiology Reports for the Evaluation of Noncontrast Chest CT

Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study

Performance of AI to exclude normal chest radiographs to reduce radiologists' workload

A Prospective Observational Study to Investigate Performance of a Chest X-ray Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Support Tool Across 12 U.S. Hospitals

Diagnostic Study on Clinical Feasibility of an AI-based Diagnostic System As a Second Reader on Mobile CT Images: a Preliminary Result.