Abstract:Background Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM) have become a critical component in assessing healthcare quality from the patient's perspective. Accurate and reproducible assessment tools are essential for generating robust and reliable results for evaluating peri-anesthesia patient experiences, identifying associated factors, and assessing the impact of healthcare interventions. However, there is currently no systematic review that consolidates all existing peri-anesthesia PREMs and evaluates their psychometric properties. Objective To identify and assess the psychometric properties of PREMs for peri-anesthesia patients. Design Systematic review of measurement properties following the COSMIN guidelines. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from January 1, 1993, to April 15, 2024. Studies reporting on the development and/or validation of any PREMs for use in the peri-anesthesia period were considered eligible. The measurement properties extracted included data on the item development process, content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, hypothesis testing and responsiveness. For the same PREM across different studies, reliability coefficients were analyzed using a meta-analysis. The quality assessment, rating of measurement properties, synthesis, and modified grading of the evidence were carried out following the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews. Results A total of 26 studies encompassing 16 PREMs were included. Among them, the Patient Satisfaction with Perioperative Anesthetic Care questionnaire (PSPACq), Perception of Quality in Anesthesia (PQA), Sindhvananda General Anesthesia Satisfaction questionnaire, and Daycare Anesthesia Satisfaction (DAS) demonstrated moderate to high-quality evidence of adequate content validity and internal consistency, resulting in strong recommendations. Five PREMs exhibited high-quality evidence of inadequate structural validity and internal consistency, receiving a "not recommended" status. The remaining PREMs were weakly recommended. Conclusions This systematic review identified PSPACq and PQA as effective tools for assessing peri-anesthesia experiences in surgical patients, suitable for both research and clinical use. Future studies should focus on thoroughly evaluating the measurement properties of these two PREMs, as many aspects remain underexplored. A high risk of bias was noted in other PREMs, particularly in content validity, structural validity, and reliability, which increases uncertainty in the evidence base. Registration This study's protocol has been registered at PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024537900.

EFFECTIVENESS OF OESTRUS INDUCTION AND FERTILITY INDICES IN COWS DEPENDING ON BIOCHEMICAL BLOOD PARAMETERS

Description of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for hospitalised patients with palliative care needs and their families, and how these map to noted areas of importance for quality care: A systematic review

Assessing the Associations of Patient-Reported Perceptions of Patient-Centered Care as Supplemental Measures of Health Care Quality in VA

Research Status and Hotspots of Patient Engagement: A Bibliometric Analysis

Do You Need To Talk About It? Prolonged Exposure for the Treatment of Chronic PTSD.

The Top 2,000 Cited Articles in Critical Care Medicine: a Bibliometric Analysis.

Psychometric evaluation of patient-reported experience measures for peri-anesthesia care: A systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines

Approaches for enhancing patient-reported experience measurement with ethnically diverse communities: a rapid evidence synthesis

Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings

Top 100 Cited Papers on Premenstrual Syndrome/Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: A Bibliometric Study

Experience of care from the perspectives of inpatients with palliative care needs: a cross-sectional study using a patient reported experience measure (PREM)

Diagnostic reliability of histological and cytological fine needle biopsies from focal liver lesions

Evaluating cancer patient-reported experience measures against health literacy best practices

Review of the Most Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) Studies Published in the Neurospine Surgical Literature

Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis

Feasibility and acceptability of the brief patient-reported experience measure consideRATE within the hospital setting for patients with palliative care needs, their families/carers and clinicians

Patient‐Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review

Altmetric, Bibliometric, and Visualized Study of Top 100 Most Cited Papers in Digital Health

Analysis and mapping the research landscape on patient‐centred care in the context of chronic disease management

Patient reported outcome and experience measures among patients with central venous access devices: a systematic review

Utility and Utilization of Patient-Reported Experience Measures for the Supplementary COVID-19 Protective Actions at the Ovidius Clinical Hospital in Romania