Bioassay-Guided Isolation of Guggulsterol I and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Properties in Ethanol Extracts From Commiphora caudata Leaves

Karupanagounder Thangaraj Uthra,Krishnan Manikandan,Thirumal Margesan,Gururaja Perumal Pazhani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68166
2024-08-29
Cureus
Abstract:The secondary metabolites of various parts of Commiphora caudata have shown a range of biological activities under both in vivo and in vitro conditions, particularly anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. While E-guggulsterone from this plant has been proven to have anti-inflammatory effects, the antioxidant potential of phytochemicals present in the leaves of C. caudata is less explored. This investigation aimed to isolate an antioxidant phytoconstituent from the ethanolic extract of the dried leaves of C. caudata using a bioassay-guided approach. The dried leaves were successively extracted with organic solvents, including ethanol. The presence of phytochemicals was tested using high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), and phytoconstituent from ethanol extract was purified by column chromatography. The antioxidant activity of both the crude extract and the purified compound was evaluated and then compared. The radical scavenging activity was measured using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. The ethanolic extract of C. caudata showed 87.6% DPPH radical scavenging activity at a concentration of 250 µg/mL, while standard ascorbic acid showed 94.9% inhibition at the same concentration. The concentrated ethanolic extract of C. caudata was subjected to silica-based column chromatography with an ascending polarity of mobile phase solvents, ethyl acetate, and ethanol (25:75), yielding a single compound. The isolated compound was confirmed as guggulsterol I by ultraviolet (UV), infrared (IR), mass, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The radical scavenging activity of the crude ethanolic extract of C. caudata leaves and the isolated compound guggulsterol I was concentration-dependent. The crude ethanolic extract of C. caudata showed significant antioxidant activity in comparison with the standard. However, the isolated guggulsterol I showed less antioxidant activity than the crude ethanolic extract. This study strongly suggests that the crude ethanolic extract of C. caudata leaves had better antioxidant activity due to the synergistic or additive effect of guggulsterol I and other phytoconstituents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?