Latency of the Autokinetic Effect as a Function of Preexposure

Lloyd F. Elfner,H. Page
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1963.17.3.862
1963-02-01
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Abstract:The writers (1963) and others (Chaplin, 1955; Voth, 1941) have reported differences between males and females in the latency and magnitude of autokinetic movement. This study assessed the latency of autokinesis for males and females who had previously experienced the effect. Thirty male and 30 female Kent State University students were used as Ss. The procedure was similar to that of the writers' study noted above, except that each S experienced the autokinetic effect under fused ( 10 cps above CFF) and flickering (10 cps below CFF) conditions before the administration of the test trials. In the pre-trials, no S required more than 5 min, to perceive the effect. The light was presented co the right eye of S in a standard flicker-fusion apparatus. The mean latency of autokinesis for the males was 17.4 sec. in the flicker and 25.3 sec. in the fused condition. The mean latency for the females was 17.1 sec. in the flicker and 26.5 sec. in the fused condition. An analysis of variance was performed on these data utilizing a repeated measures model as described by Edwards (1950, p. 295). The results of the analysis demonstrated no significant difference between males and females (F SO), a significant difference between flicker and fused conditions (F = 17.40, df = 1, p SO). These findings suggest that there may be no basic difference between men and women in the appreciation of autokinesis and that differences in naive Ss are a function of the greater responsiveness of females to E's initial instructions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?