Abstract:Several studies have shown the differences among chronotypes in the circadian rhythm of different physiological variables. Individuals show variation in their preference for the daily timing of activity; additionally, there is an association between chronotype and sleep duration/sleep complaints. Few studies have investigated sleep quality during the week days and weekends in relation to the circadian typology using self-assessment questionnaires or actigraphy. The purpose of this study was to use actigraphy to assess the relationship between the three chronotypes and the circadian rhythm of activity levels and to determine whether sleep parameters respond differently with respect to time (weekdays versus the weekend) in Morning-types (M-types), Neither-types (N-types) and Evening-types (E-types). The morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ) was administered to 502 college students to determine their chronotypes. Fifty subjects (16 M-types, 15 N-types and 19 E-types) were recruited to undergo a 7-days monitoring period with an actigraph (Actiwacth® actometers, CNT, Cambridge, UK) to evaluate their sleep parameters and the circadian rhythm of their activity levels. To compare the amplitude and the acrophase among the three chronotypes, we used a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. To compare the Midline Estimating Statistic of Rhythm (MESOR) among the three chronotypes, we used a Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test followed by pairwise comparisons that were performed using Dunn's procedure with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The analysis of each sleep parameter was conducted using the mixed ANOVA procedure. The results showed that the chronotype was influenced by sex (χ(2) with p = 0.011) and the photoperiod at birth (χ(2) with p < 0.05). Though the MESOR and amplitude of the activity levels were not different among the three chronotypes, the acrophases compared by the ANOVA post-hoc test were significantly different (p < 0.001). The ANOVA post-hoc test revealed the presence of a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the M-types (14:32 h) and E-types (16:53 h). There was also a significant interaction between the chronotype and four sleep parameters: Sleep end, Assumed Sleep, Immobility Time and Sleep Efficiency. Sleep Efficiency showed the same patterns as did Assumed Sleep and Immobility Time: the Sleep Efficiency of the E-types was poorer than that of the M- and N-types during weekdays (77.9% ± 7.0 versus 84.1% ± 4.9 and 84.1% ± 5.2) but was similar to that measured in the M- and N-types during the weekend. Sleep Latency and Movement and Fragmentation Index were not different among the three chronotypes and did not change on the weekend compared with weekdays. This study highlights two key findings: first, we observed that the circadian rhythm of activity levels was influenced by the chronotype; second, the chronotype had a significant effect on sleep parameters: the E-types had a reduced sleep quality and quantity compared with the M- and N-types during weekdays, whereas the E-types reached the same levels as the other chronotypes during the weekends. These findings suggest that E-types accumulate a sleep deficit during weekdays due to social and academic commitments and that they recover from this deficit during "free days" on the weekend.

Chronotype and lifestyle in the transition to adulthood: Exploring the role of sleep health and circadian misalignment

Chronotype, gender and general health

Associations between chronotype and employment status in a longitudinal study of an elderly population

EVENING CHRONOTYPE AS A RISK FACTOR FOR UNHEALTHY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL JETLAG

Biological Rhythm and Chronotype: New Perspectives in Health

Sleep–Wake Timings in Adolescence: Chronotype Development and Associations with Adjustment

Chronotype influences activity circadian rhythm and sleep: Differences in sleep quality between weekdays and weekend

Perils of the nighttime: Impact of behavioral timing and preference on mental health in 73,888 community-dwelling adults

Evening types have social jet lag and metabolic alterations in school-age children

A Longitudinal Examination between Chronotype and Insomnia in Youths: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis

Understanding Sleep-Wake Behavior in Late Chronotype Adolescents: The Role of Circadian Phase, Sleep Timing, and Sleep Propensity

The impact of chronotype on circadian rest-activity rhythm and sleep characteristics across the week

The relationship between chronotype characteristics and fear of missing out, phubbing, sleep quality and social jetlag in medical students

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Associations between Chronotype, Social Jetlag and Subjective Sleep Quality in Healthy Adults

Mindful larks and lonely owls: The relationship between chronotype, mental health, sleep quality, and social support in young adults

Sleep Matters in Chronotype and Mental Health Association: Evidence from the UK and Germany

Associations of chronotype and sleep patterns with metabolic syndrome in the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos

The Association between Chronotype and Dietary Pattern among Adults: A Scoping Review

Relationships between sleep, exercise timing, and chronotype in young adults

The associations of chronotype and social jetlag with prosocial behavior problems among Chinese adolescents

0809 Circadian Phase Delays from School Nights to Weekends and Relates to Sleep Characteristics in High School Students