Dronabinol Is Not a Game Changer in Pediatric Palliative Care: Results from a Retrospective Study

Holger Hauch,Annika Lisakowski,Julia Wager,Boris Zernikow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children11091054
2024-08-28
Abstract:Background/objectives: Patients with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) often suffer from restlessness, spasticity, pain, and seizures. Dronabinol (DRB) may have a relieving effect; however, data on the effectiveness of DRB in children with LLCs are limited to outpatients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DRB. Methods: Retrospective analysis of inpatients. Results: From 2011 to 2021, 1219 patients were admitted. Of these, 63 patients (63.5% male, age: 10.4 (SD = 6.3) years) were treated with DRB; 96.8% had a neurological disease, and 26 patients were started on DRB (group A), while 37 were admitted with existing DRB (group B). The effective doses were 0.21 (SD = 0.11) in group A and 0.48 (SD = 0.5) mg/kg/BW/day in group B (p = 0.01). Subjective response rates to DRB in both groups (good/moderate effect) were 9.5%/38.1% for spasticity and 1.6%/25.4% for restlessness. However, no reduction in seizures, restlessness, or demand medication was observed in 24 h protocols when patients started DRB in group A. Three patients experienced severe side effects (e.g., respiratory depression). Other side effects included fatigue (22.2%) and behavioral problems (14.3%). Conclusions: Subjective positive effects could not be confirmed by more objective data. Side effects can be severe. Thus, DRB should be started in a well-monitored setting and only with clear indications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?