Cannabidiol Treatment for Adult Patients with Drug‐Resistant Epilepsies: A Real‐World Study in a Tertiary Center

Quentin Calonge,Aurore Besnard,Laurent Bailly,Maria Damiano,Phintip Pichit,Sophie Dupont,Isabelle Gourfinkel‐An,Vincent Navarro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70122
IF: 3.1
2024-11-07
Brain and Behavior
Abstract:We extracted all adult patients treated at our tertiary center with cannabidiol for pharmacoresistant epilepsy, with a follow‐up of at least 1 year, and evaluated the efficacy and retention based on the indication. We found similar efficacy and retention rates in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex compared to other forms of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Background and purpose Around 30% of patients with epilepsy show drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE). While cannabidiol has demonstrated efficacy as an adjunctive treatment in Dravet syndrome (DS), Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS), and epilepsy related to tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), its more global effectiveness in adult patients with DRE apart from these three specific contexts needs to be clarified. Methods We conducted a retrospective study at the epilepsy unit of Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital. Patients initiating pharmaceutical cannabidiol treatment and followed for at least 1 year were included. Patients were categorized into "authorized" (LGS, DS, or TSC) and "off‐label" groups. Cannabidiol effectiveness and tolerance were compared between groups, and characteristics of responders (patients with >50% reduction in seizure frequency) in the off‐label group were examined. Results Ninety‐one patients, followed by a median duration of 24 months, were included. A total of 35.2% of the patients were in the authorized group. No significant differences were observed in responder rates between groups (31.3% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.85) and retention rates at 1 year (75.0% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.97). Sleepiness was more commonly reported in the authorized group (50.0% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.01), with no other significant differences. Among off‐label patients (n = 59), clobazam co‐prescription was more prevalent in responders (71.4% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.002). Conclusion Our findings suggest that cannabidiol may benefit all adult patients with DRE, particularly those already receiving clobazam. Randomized controlled trials are warranted in off‐label patients to validate these observational findings.
behavioral sciences,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?