Adherence to patient blood management strategy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective nationwide multicenter study

Javier Tejedor-Tejada,María Pilar Ballester,Francisco Jose Del Castillo-Corzo,Sandra García-Mateo,María Jose Domper-Arnal,Pablo Parada-Vazquez,Rosa M Saiz-Chumillas,Manuel Alfonso Jiménez-Moreno,Gadea Hontoria-Bautista,Belén Bernad-Cabredo,Concepción Gómez,María Capilla,Margarita Fernández-De La Varga,Lara Ruiz-Belmonte,Berta Lapeña-Muñoz,María Calvo Iñiguez,María Fraile-González,Pablo Flórez-Díez,Víctor Jair Morales-Alvarado,Pedro G Delgado-Guillena,Pablo Cañamares-Orbis,Esteban Saez-González,Natalia García-Morales,Miguel Montoro,Óscar Murcia-Pomares
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002843
2024-09-23
Abstract:Introduction: Patient blood management (PBM) adherence in clinical practice is unclear. This real-world practice study assessed the management of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding after the implementation of the PBM strategy. Methods: This was a nationwide multicenter and prospective study involving consecutive adults with GI bleeding between March 2019 and March 2021. Patients were examined according to hemoglobin (Hb) level at admission (<7 g/dl, n = 93; 7-8 g/dl, n = 47; 8-9 g/dl, n = 61; and >9 g/dl, n = 249). Study outcomes measures were morbidity and mortality during hospitalization and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Appropriate anemia or iron deficiency management was considered when adherence to PBM policy was higher than 75%. Results: A total of 450 patients (57.6% men, median age: 74 years, interquartile range: 63-82) were included. Overall, 55.1% and 59.3% of patients received transfusion and iron supplementation, respectively. The rates of appropriate transfusion and iron supplementation adherence were 90.9% (range: 86.9-93.5%, P = 0.109) and 81.8% (range: 78.5-85.1%, P = 0.041), depending on Hb level, respectively. No associations were observed between adherence to the PBM strategy and length of stay (P = 0.263) or risk of further bleeding (P = 0.742). Patients who were transfused [hazard ratio (HR): 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.85] and iron supplemented (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.38-1.41), however, appropriately achieved a lower risk of death. Age (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.12-1.25) and further bleeding (HR: 39.08, 95% CI: 4.01-181.24) were poor prognostic factors. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: In this nationwide study, there is a high level of adherence and safety of PBM for the treatment of GI bleeding. Adherence to the PBM strategy improved outcomes in patients with GI bleeding.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?